Medtronic in the Crosshairs: 3 Suits Claim IP and Employee Poaching
Medical device giant Medtronic was hit with three lawsuits in the District of Delaware on Nov. 12—two by the previous employer of former Medtronic employees, and one by a doctor who claims the company stole her product design.
November 13, 2024 at 04:19 PM
2 minute read
Medical device giant Medtronic was hit with three lawsuits in the District of Delaware on Nov. 12—two by the previous employer of former Medtronic employees, and one by a doctor who claims the company stole her product design.
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell and Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone filed a patent-infringement case on behalf of Hexagon Health Inc. and Shirin Towfigh, a surgeon who founded Hexagon and holds the patents in question.
That complaint alleges after Towfigh met with Medtronic representatives to discuss possible collaboration, Medtronic began designing a product based on Towfigh's ideas for an anatomical mesh used in hernia repair.
Towfigh claims the mesh product Medtronic launched in 2020 was her invention, and Medtronic wasn't authorized to use it.
"Medtronic’s unlawful behavior has not only denied Dr. Towfigh and Hexagon Health of the full value of her inventions but also set back the field of hernia health, a critical but understudied medical specialty in need of treatment options that innovative specialist-physicians like Dr. Towfigh are uniquely positioned to address," the complaint alleged.
"Medtronic just learned of the case and is reviewing the complaint," said Boua Xiong, a spokesperson for Medtronic. "Medtronic believes in its innovation and has a long history of respecting the intellectual property rights of other innovators."
Meanwhile, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani is representing Axonics Inc., a company which focuses on treatments for bladder and bowel dysfunction, in the other two cases filed the same day as the patent suit but unrelated aside from all naming Medtronic as a defendant.
The two cases, each brought against Medtronic and one former Axonics employee who accepted a job at Medtronic, claim former employees Emily Turkot and Carmen Fermin violated their employment agreements by working on a Medtronic product line that competes with Axonics products.
The complaints claim those employees, both of whom were clinical specialists at Axonics, breached the non-solicitation provision in their contracts, and they state Medtronic has made an effort to recruit Axonics employees generally.
"Medtronic is committed to fair employment practices that comply with the law and enable the company to attract and retain a best-in-class, highly talented and innovative workforce," Xiong said. "Medtronic will defend itself vigorously against these claims."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDLA Piper Exhibited 'Far From Exemplary Conduct' in Patent Infringement Case, Judge Finds
Kramer Levin's Patent Trial Team Discusses Teaching Tech to Juries
Del. Jury Awards Nearly $45M for IBM in Patent Dispute With Zynga Games
4 minute readOuraring Claims Competitor RingConn Infringed on Wearable Tech Patents
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250