Portal Crypto Exchange Faces Delaware Investor Class Action
“The allegations in the complaint are about investors being bullied into signing these conversions and being lied to about the use of this money,” said Eric Rosen, a partner at Dynamis.
November 11, 2024 at 04:13 PM
3 minute read
What You Need to Know
- Portal, a crypto startup, issued $31 million in convertible promissory notes in 2021.
- Unable to repay, Portal allegedly pressured investors to convert their notes into equity.
- The attorneys pointed to the larger aspects of this action.
Investors filed a class action lawsuit in a state court in Delaware over allegedly fraudulent practices by a cryptocurrency exchange that left them with worthless equity, rather than the $31 million repayment promised under their notes.
Eric Rosen and Constantine P. Economides, partners at Dynamis in its Miami and New York offices, and Christine M. Mackintosh, a partner at Grant & Eisenhofer in Wilmington, Delaware, said aspects of the case in which they represent Jonathan Chitty and Conor Stapleton, against Tides.Network Inc., operating as Portal, are similar to macroeconomic components across the crypto industry.
“There is this emerging, valuable technology ecosystem and developing Web3 industry that developed outside of any clear regulatory structure, and that leaves ambiguity in the protections that exist for other financial products, like currencies, investments, whatever you want to term it,” Economides said. “That is one relevant component here and that is industry-wide.”
Portal did not respond to a request for comment.
Now, the case is pending before Delaware Chancery Judge Nathan A. Cook in which the prospective class alleged eight claims, including seeking a declaratory judgment that the series notes have not been converted, breach of contract, and fraud in the inducement.
Founded in 2018 and headquartered in San Francisco, Portal is a financial services company that provides its users a platform to trade Bitcoin and other crypto assets anywhere in the world.
In 2021, Portal raised $31 million through convertible promissory notes, promising repayment or conversion into equity if the company achieved a specified financing level by 2022, per the complaint. However, when crypto markets crashed and Portal’s financial health deteriorated, it allegedly failed to conduct the qualifying $10 million financing needed to convert the notes to equity.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSuit Against Delaware Software Company Aims Recover $4M in Malicious Email Spoofing Attack
4 minute readMDL Judge - Not Del. Bankruptcy Judge - Should Be in Charge of FTX Customer Claims, Attorneys Say
5 minute readFederal Judge Greenlights Discovery in Forex, Crypto Dispute Involving Delaware-Registered Platform
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250