X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Wilmington Trust

Wilmington Trust can’t be held legally responsible for any of the claims a trust’s current trustee and beneficiary leveled against it, U.S. District Judge Colm F. Connolly of the District of Delaware has ruled.

Connolly that found Roen Trust trustee Premier Trust Inc. and beneficiary Frieda Mae Rogers didn’t prove Wilmington Trust’s actions as the trust’s former trustee and adviser made it liable. He said that while duties with regard to the trust ware not handled “responsibly” on all sides, no illegality on the part of Wilmington Trust could be proven.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Ellen Bardash

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.