Some experts believe a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling involving a challenge to the length of a statute of limitations could produce more demand for litigators than one curtailing all federal regulatory agencies’ powers.

The Supreme Court said June 28 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo that it was overturning a legal precedent set in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council in 1984 that federal judges should defer to regulatory agencies in cases when a law is ambiguous.