Fisher & Phillips 'Proactively' Cuts Pay, With Equity Partners Bearing Brunt
Pay is reduced by 20% for lawyer and staff employees, while equity partners will "plan for at least 50% cuts [to profit distribution] until the crisis clears," said the firm's chairman.
April 10, 2020 at 06:06 PM
2 minute read
National labor and employment firm Fisher & Phillips has temporarily cut pay for all lawyers and staff, while furloughing some employees who can't work remotely, said the firm's chairman, Roger Quillen.
In an interview, Quillen said that the Atlanta-headquartered firm had a very busy first quarter, but the firm proactively wants "to ensure solid financial footing for the firm throughout the COVID-19 crisis and the related economic fallout."
Fisher & Phillips is reducing pay by 20% for all employees—lawyers and staff alike—and its equity partners "will participate at a much deeper level in the form of restricted distribution of profits until the crisis clears," Quillen said.
"Relative to expected earnings, we've told our equity partners to plan for at least 50% cuts until the crisis clears. That could be in the form of temporarily reduced profits [for the firm] or restricted [profit] distributions—or both," he explained.
That means that "for the duration of the crisis, equity partners will experience cuts of far more than 20%," he added.
Quillen confirmed that the firm will furlough some employees handling office support who cannot work remotely and that it will reduce working time for its hourly staff by 20%, as first reported by Above the Law.
"We have taken these steps in the long-term interest of the business and the 900-plus families who depend upon Fisher Phillips for their livelihoods," he said.
The firm has about 450 lawyers and 900 total employees in 36 offices nationwide.
Fisher & Phillips reported a healthy fiscal year for 2019, posting a 10.9% revenue increase to $222.5 million and a 4.8% increase in net income to $73.52 million. Profit per equity partner increased by 3.1% to $592,000.
Quillen said that the workplace law firm continues to be busy advising clients on a variety of workplace matters arising from the coronavirus and subsequent national shutdown.
"Despite shelter-in-place orders, we have not missed a beat in helping clients," he said. "We were first to provide a full-service COVID-19 resource center covering every facet of the workplace—and now far beyond. Our robust technology platform allowed our professionals to transition seamlessly to be fully engaged and responsive from their homes."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Moore & Van Allen Adds Finance Partner From Morris Manning
5 minute readBridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
King & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250