With Threat of Coronavirus Looming, Eleventh Circuit Cancels Judicial Conference
Chief Judge Ed Carnes said that in the face of the evolving threat of the novel coronavirus, it was "necessary and prudent" to cancel the May judicial conference in Atlanta.
March 11, 2020 at 06:04 PM
3 minute read
The evolving threat of the COVID-19 virus has prompted the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to cancel its May judicial conference, Chief Judge Ed Carnes announced Wednesday.
The circuit's 2020 conference—which brings together federal judges from Georgia, Florida and Alabama, as well as lawyers who practice in the circuit—was scheduled to take place from May 6-9 in Atlanta. The Eleventh Circuit conferences are held biennially and generally qualify as continuing legal education credits for the attorneys and judges who attend.
Carnes said in a news release that he decided to cancel the conference given warnings by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp that canceling the conference was "necessary and prudent in the interest of all those who would have attended."
Conferences in other industries have been canceled across the globe as well to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, also known as coronavirus.
Carnes said he hopes to reschedule the conference sometime in 2021, "if circumstances permit," given the importance of judicial conferences to the bench and the bar.
Carnes canceled the conference a day after the Supreme Court of Georgia issued a court order temporarily waiving the six-hour, in person continuing legal education requirement for active members of the State Bar of Georgia. The waiver is effective immediately and, for now, will remain in place through March 31. Bar members will still be required to complete the 12-hour CLE requirement but may do so through self-study, in-house, or online seminars.
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, the clerk's office of the Georgia Court of Appeals held an all-day drill with a skeleton staff to test its ability to continue court functions in an emergency.
Court clerk Steve Castlen said 35 people from the clerk's office and court administration worked remotely, leaving just three staff members in the courthouse. Castlen said that the appellate court has been preparing for several years to install technology that allows all the judges, their staff attorneys and administrative assistants to work remotely.
"As of today, every person in our office is able to work from home to accomplish every task needed to keep our systems running—except one," Castlen said Wednesday. "The one thing we cannot do from home is collect a paper filing from a pro se person who walks in with paper in hand, and hands it to one of us."
Castlen said that whether and how the court may conduct oral arguments is "something we are monitoring" and is under discussion by the en banc court. No oral arguments are scheduled for March, he said.
"Our term [of art] is 'continuity of operations' during an emergency no matter what it is," he Castlen added. "Coronavirus just happens to be the emergency we are dealing with today."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readGa. Election Workers Settle Defamation Lawsuit Against Conservative Website
4 minute readTo Woo Law Firms, Legal Training Platforms Are Combining Hands-On and Online Learning
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250