'Alarmed' and 'Displeased': DeKalb Election Superintendent Calls on Board to Rescind Voter Purge
DeKalb County Election Superintendent Dele Loman Smith has recommended that the county law department decide if the board violated the law when it removed registered voters living in Decatur.
August 22, 2019 at 06:41 PM
4 minute read
DeKalb County's election superintendent has called on the elections board to rescind a recent voter purge, saying she was "alarmed and profoundly displeased" by civil rights lawyers' claim it was illegal.
In an email obtained by the Daily Report that was sent to election officials and attorneys with the ACLU and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Thursday, Superintendent Dele Loman Smith recommended that the county law department decide whether the board violated the law when it categorically removed all registered voters listed at a single address in Decatur from the voter rolls.
The Peer Support, Wellness, and Respite Center is located at the address at issue and advertises itself as a center available to people with mental disabilities who need housing as an alternative to hospitalization.
Smith also recommended that the administrative coordinator for the DeKalb County Voter Registration and Elections office, who owns the property in question with her husband, be barred from further involvement in the matter due to a conflict of interest.
Smith called out administrator coordinator Mary Frances Weeks after Weeks responded on Thursday to an Aug. 20 letter from ACLU legal director Sean Young and John Powers, counsel for the Washington, D.C., lawyers committee. The letter, which included a public records request, put county election officials on notice that they do not have authority to determine what constitutes housing, "especially for those hardest hit by life's struggles."
The lawyers contended that the center may serve as a residence for people struggling to find permanent housing and may be the only address for people who are otherwise homeless.
In a letter delivered to the ACLU on Thursday, Weeks said she and her husband own the center. She said the challenge that led to the voter purge was first made by the city of Decatur, which couldn't identify 444
Sycamore Drive as a legitimate address.
Weeks said the legal address is actually 207 Springdale St., but because the driveway is at 444 Sycamore, it "is easier for the clients to locate it."
"Obviously, I was aware that no one resides there," she said. "If you need us to have the director confirm that there is no one living there, we will be happy to do so. … Regardless, there is no such address as 444 Sycamore Drive in Decatur."
Smith said she was never told about Weeks' conflict or that the voter purge "did not comply with the legal requirements that it be made by an elector rather than a city or other entity."
The lack of disclosure and Weeks' apparent conflict was compounded by having Weeks respond to the civil rights lawyers "in a manner that I found to be both defensive and unresponsive," Smith said. "I am alarmed and profoundly displeased to have learned more information about this matter from an outside organization than was shared by staff."
Smith said she voted for the purges in the belief that all pertinent facts were shared with the board and the letter of the law was followed. But, she continued, "I cannot carry out my duties as a board member if those basic expectations are not met. This situation has only exacerbated the distrust of the board among members of the public, and unless it is promptly and satisfactorily rectified, it will undermine the cohesive functioning of the board as well."
On Thursday, Young called Weeks' response on behalf of the elections board and the voter registration office "inadequate on its face."
"We look forward to reviewing all the documents concerning the purge," he said. "We just want to know what happened."
Powers said he was "puzzled" by Weeks' letter, which he said raises further questions about the actual reasons behind the purge.
"It is troubling that the board's official response came from an employee who has an interest in the property at the voters' address," he said. "The residents of DeKalb County, and especially the voters who were purged, deserve transparency and real answers about what motivated their removal from the voter rolls."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250