Justice Center Topping Out Reset for Tuesday
Coats and Sharpies will come in handy. All the justices and judges of the Georgia Supreme Court and Court of Appeals will sign the final beam for the appellate court building before they watch it hoisted to the top in the freezing cold.
November 26, 2018 at 02:30 PM
4 minute read
The topping-out ceremony for the state's $127 million justice center to house the two appellate courts has been reset for Tuesday.
The event—traditionally a time to celebrate for a contractor and construction crew—was canceled twice the week before Thanksgiving: first for the funeral of retired Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice P. Harris Hines, who had helped plan the building, then again because of rain and gloom.
“It's been quite a conundrum,” said Morgan Smith-Williams, public relations coordinator for the State Properties Commission and Building Authority. Sunny skies are forecast Tuesday, but the temperature will be near freezing. Expect a fast ceremony. “We don't want to keep people out in the cold,” she said.
The Georgia Supreme Court and Court of Appeals have been invited to a private lunch with the general contractor, Gilbane, at noon under tents pitched on the construction site. The public part of the event will start after that and wrap up within a half-hour, Smith-Williams said.
First, Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Harold Melton will give remarks. Then all the justices of the high court and judges of the intermediate appellate court will sign the last beam to be placed on the top. How do 24 people sign a steel beam in freezing weather? “I think just a regular extra fat Sharpie marker,” Smith-Williams said.
Typically it's the construction crew and the contractors who sign the final beam, according to Smith-Williams, who also recently worked on a much bigger state construction project, the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium for the Atlanta Falcons.
But this one is different because of its unique nature and tenants. “This building is so highly customized,” Smith-Williams said. “It's a courthouse.”
After the judges sign the final beam, all will watch as the crew lifts it to its place atop the building. The justices and judges may take a private tour afterward. And, if anyone wants to talk later with representatives from the general contractor, Gilbane, or the architectural firm, Stevens & Wilkinson, that will likely be done inside the construction trailers parked on the 5-acre site—with heat, Smith-Williams suggested.
The total price tag for the project is up to about $127 million, according to the latest figures from the building authority chief financial officer, shared by Smith-Williams. So far, $119 million has been appropriated for construction, design and site preparation: $105 million for construction, $6.5 million and $7.5 million for design and site prep at different times, including demolishing the state archives building that was on the site. Plus, at the moment, the Georgia Building Authority has $8.5 million set aside for furniture, fixtures, and equipment related to the building.
The bulk of the financing came from $105 million worth of bonds sold in 2017, according to Building Authority Executive Director Steve Stancil.
Initial plans had been to open the building in August 2019. The ribbon-cutting ceremony has now been pushed to December, with hopes of moving judges and their staffs in during the holiday season and opening to the public at the start of 2020, Smith-Williams said.
The building doesn't have a name yet. But legislative leaders have hinted they plan to take the opportunity to honor Gov. Nathan Deal. The building is the brick-and-mortar part of Deal's vision for the state's justice system, the first home for the intermediate and high appellate courts, which up until now have been jammed into state office buildings with the attorney general and other departments. Deal also is the governor who expanded both appellate courts and named more new judges than any of his predecessors.
By the time the building opens, Deal will no longer be governor, but it will have his name: the Nathan Deal Judicial Center.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPopulation and Caseload Boom Birth New West Georgia Judicial Circuit
7 minute readOn The Move: Moore & Van Allen Adds to C-Suite, Cadwalader Promotes Three in Charlotte
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250