FREDY D. OSORIO, PLAINTIFF, V. STATE FARM BANK, DEFENDANT
Case No.: 13-10951
Giving a pro-plaintiff tilt to a crucial part of the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the federal appellate court for Florida, Georgia and Alabama revived a case that resounds with hundreds of autodialed calls.
April 14, 2014 at 11:00 AM
1 minute read
FREDY D. OSORIO, PLAINTIFF, V. STATE FARM BANK, DEFENDANT
Case No.: 13-10951
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS