In a split decision, the 11th Circuit said the agency is violating the 1966 law by not granting all spouses of exiles a 30-month rollback on their status as permanent residents - and thus delaying their path to U.S. citizenship.
November 15, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In a split decision, a federal appellate panel said Wednesday that the nation’s immigration agency is violating the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 by not granting all spouses of exiles a 30-month rollback on their status as permanent residents and thus delaying their path to U.S. citizenship.
The case stems from a 2011 lawsuit filed by Camila Maria Silva-Hernandez in Miami against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
