"The opinion certainly demonstrates a level of disagreement that seems to go beyond legal jousting," said Michael J. Gelfand, senior partner at Gelfand & Arpe.
June 14, 2021 at 04:25 PM
5 minute read
A U.S. appellate opinion about whether a Palm Beach County resident can reconstruct his beachfront mansion to his particular tastes became the forum for a 136-page spat between two federal jurists.
The opinion pitted Judge Robert Luck of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Eleventh Circuit in the majority against Senior Judge Stanley Marcus, who dissented.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
(L-R)U.S. Appeals Judges Robert Luck and Stanley Marcus. Courtesy photos
