Former Anidjar & Levine Lawyers Accuse Firm of Weaponizing Its Network Against Them
The lawsuit alleges South Florida personal injury giant Anidjar & Levine employed unfair tactics against a new spinoff firm.
April 15, 2020 at 05:44 PM
4 minute read
Two attorneys who decided to go it alone after working for Florida personal injury firm Anidjar & Levine have turned to Broward Circuit Court with allegations that their former employer tried to thwart their new practice.
Plaintiffs Victor Demesmin Jr. and Jeremy Dover allege it took just four months for their new Fort Lauderdale firm Demesmin & Dover, which represents doctors and health care providers against person injury protection insurance carriers, to come under fire from Anidjar & Levine.
Their lawsuit alleges that instead of fair play, the firm's founding partners Marc Anidjar, Glen Levine and managing partner of its separate PIP litigation division Travis Greene weaponized their large network to give clients an ultimatum: "Demesmin & Dover, or Anidjar & Levine."
The complaint alleges the defendants "bullied, intimidated and bribed" doctors and health care providers. It alleges the Anidjar & Levine attorneys had these professionals sign ghost-written cease-and-desist letters that cut ties with Demesmin & Dover, promised future work if the doctors and providers signed, and threatened to stop sending patients their way if they didn't.
"Knowing full well that the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is causing a sudden economic strain on doctors and providers, defendants are purposely using the 'carrot' of future business to coerce doctors and providers … to send the ghost-written cease-and-desist letters to Demesmin & Dover, and the 'stick' of withholding any future business if they refuse," the complaint said.
|'Unequivocally false'
Anidjar & Levine denied any wrongdoing through its attorneys, Jeremy Slusher and Daniel Miller of Slusher and Rosenblum in West Palm Beach.
"The allegations are unequivocally false, brought by two former employees who are trying to create a name for themselves by baselessly attacking others, who have achieved great success in the areas they practice," Slusher said via email. "This lawsuit is a trivial attempt of these former employees to use the court system to leverage the success and stellar reputation that their former employer has spent over 15 years building. We are confident our clients will be vindicated in this matter."
Kevin Yombor and Avery Dial of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck in Fort Lauderdale represent Demesmin and Dover, who claim they became suspicious after receiving cease-and-desist letters from different clients in the same font and language. The complaint alleges several providers have admitted they were pressured into signing the letters.
The lawsuit also cites curious quotations in bold font, including, "A person's true character is often revealed in times of crisis or temptation."
Demesmin joined Anidjar & Levine in August 2016, while Dover joined in September 2017. The complaint claims the lawyers helped the firm obtain about $9 million in attorney fees and costs. It claims they tried to leave on good terms in November 2019, but their employer dismissed them early.
The 75-page complaint accuses the defendants of 15 counts of tortious interference, unfair competition and civil conspiracy. It also comes with multiple exhibits, showing copies of the cease-and-desist letters, texts and emails purportedly showing that the defendants pressured clients.
The complaint announces its intention to seek punitive damages, and also points the finger at a Pompano chiropractor who allegedly helped Anidjar & Levine encourage providers to drop Demesmin & Dover.
Anidjar & Levine has more than 25 attorneys across six offices in Fort Lauderdale, Miami, West Palm Beach, Orlando, Jacksonville and Naples.
Broward Circuit Judge Carlos Augusto Rodriguez will preside over the litigation.
|Read the complaint:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Historic Flooding, Power Outages and Debris From Hurricane Milton Forced Tampa Law Firms to Go Remote
3 minute readSullivan & Cromwell Dismissed as Defendant in Lawsuit from FTX Investors
Eleventh Circuit Rules for Moms for Liberty in Free Speech Case Against School Board
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5How I Made Partner: 'There's No Substitute for Hard Work and a Genuine Desire to Improve,' Says Justin Hawal of DiCello Levitt
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250