The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has granted en banc review of a decision that business groups called a “dramatic departure” on standing to bring privacy claims under the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Spokeo v. Robins.

The decision, by three judges of an Eleventh Circuit panel, found that a customer of Godiva Chocolatier Inc. had standing to sue after the store gave him a receipt that displayed 10 digits of his credit card number in violation of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act. An objector to the $6.3 million class action settlement of the case petitioned the Eleventh Circuit to have an en banc panel rehear the standing argument, which conflicted with the Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Spokeo. Several business groups filed amicus briefs supporting rehearing, adding that the Eleventh Circuit now stood apart from four other circuits, which found no standing in similar cases.