Legal Aid Groups Bring Class Action Against Florida Agencies Over Medicaid Terminations
The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and the Florida Department of Children and Families were named in a putative class action lawsuit accusing the organizations of abridging federal law and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution by improperly stripping Florida residents of Medicaid benefits.
August 09, 2019 at 04:27 PM
5 minute read
A new proposed class action lawsuit in Florida has accused state agencies of wrongfully terminating Florida residents’ Medicare coverage on a systemic basis.
The complaint alleged the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and the Florida Department of Children and Families have repeatedly abridged the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as federal Medicare law, in their treatment of beneficiaries.
According to the suit, the defendants have engaged in a “pattern and practice of terminating Medicaid benefits for individuals whose coverage would continue” under separate qualifications and additional review.
The named plaintiffs, Clayton Harrell and Austin Trueblood, were purportedly not notified that their Medicaid benefits had ended, although they both remained eligible for the program under different categories outside the ones in which they had originally enrolled.
“Since 2014, the legal services organizations of undersigned counsel have represented at least 30 individuals who lost their Medicaid coverage due to termination of an adoption subsidy or [Supplemental Security Income] benefits and for whom defendants failed to conduct an ex-parte review of their continued eligibility under another Medicaid category,” the complaint said.
The suit claimed both Harrell and Trueblood were entitled to conduct hearings challenging the termination of their Medicaid enrollment, as well as receive ongoing coverage pending the outcome of their appeal.
The putative class would comprise individuals who were stripped of their Medicaid because their eligibility through Florida’s Adoption Assistance program or federal disability benefits concluded, “but who may remain eligible for another category of Medicaid,” according to the lawsuit.
Read the class action complaint:
“The legal services organizations … rely on individuals contacting them and it is unknown how many individuals are not aware of their services but may nonetheless be impacted by defendants’ failures,” the suit said. “Without assistance from undersigned counsels’ organizations to enforce their right to continued Medicaid eligibility and educate them about their right to adequate, pre-termination notice and hearing, these individuals would likely still be without Medicaid.”
Katy DeBriere, legal director of Florida Health Justice Project, told the Daily Business Review the proposed class might number in the thousands. She said the litigation’s origins lie with identical cases litigated by her and peers at Jacksonville Area Legal Aid and Disability Rights Florida. DeBriere said she and other advocates “were really tired of fixing these issues on an individual basis.”
“I can’t even imagine the amount of people who don’t realize it’s a legal issue, and they can call for legal help,” she said. “We would like to see this issue fixed on a systemic basis because we’ve seen too many clients to whom this has happened.”
The complaint noted “by its own admission, DCF does not employ a sufficient amount of staff” to correctly process Florida residents’ Medicare eligibility.
“All the written policies with DCF say the right things, they’re just not happening,” DeBriere said, adding additional staffing and more thorough information processing could alleviate the problems experienced by her clients. “Ideally we’d be working with these state agencies to come up with fixes to make sure people are not falling through the cracks. So we need to have a conversation, whether that be through litigation or sitting in mediation, and ask why aren’t these policies being implemented?”
DCF’s media office did not return requests for comment by press time. Patrick Manderfield, deputy communications director with the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, said the agency does not comment on pending litigation.
Florida’s Children First founder and Talenfeld Law managing partner Howard Talenfeld said he’s observed the circumstances outlined in the complaint in his own practice. Talenfeld, a longtime advocate for children’s rights and on child-disability issues, is not involved in the class-action litigation. But he said Florida has an extensive history of being sued over inadequate welfare and disability programs.
“We’ve seen Medicaid extraordinarily limit services to its clients on many fronts,” Talenfeld said, noting problems such as those detailed in the suit stem in part from significant budget cuts to public assistance programs. The attorney added Florida courts have been “extremely supportive” of certified classes with similar allegations.
“This case is extremely concerning, because we know that when they fall off of Medicaid or the adoption subsidies end, these children are without resources to fully transition into adulthood,” he said. “I’m extremely hopeful that the agency leaders … will respond to these serious allegations with corrective action.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 2Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 3Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 4Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250