Roy D. Oppenheim, of Oppemheim Law in Weston. Photo: J. Albert Diaz/ALM.
The appellate panel found that because homeowner Farshadi Faramarz had argued U.S. Bank N.A. and Nationstar had no standing to sue him under the contract, that took away his right to fees from those parties under that same contract. The Fourth District Court of Appeals relied on Nationstar v. Glass, which has a shaky history.
June 27, 2019 at 01:37 PM
1 minute read
A homeowner who prevailed in a foreclosure case missed out on an award of $104,700 in attorney fees and costs Wednesday, when the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court’s order allowing it.
The appellate panel found that because Farshadi Faramarz had used a lack of standing defense to get the lawsuit dismissed, that took away his right to fees.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
