South Florida Lawyers Win $38M Verdict in Tire Defect Case
The plaintiff was driving a cement truck when the tire blew out and the truck rolled over. He was left quadriplegic.
March 26, 2018 at 02:39 PM
4 minute read
Coral Gables lawyers won a nearly $38 million verdict against a major tire manufacturer after a cement truck blew out tire and rolled over, leaving the driver quadriplegic.
Plaintiff Robert Benedict was on a cement delivery in Chesterfield, Virginia, in 2014 when the Hankook Tire Co. tire broke apart and sent the truck veering off the road. The truck hit an embankment and flipped, pinning Benedict in the cab. A witness, an ex-Marine who served in Kuwait, said the crash was so violent it would stick with him forever, plaintiffs attorney Jay Halpern said.
Benedict, then 50, broke his neck and was paralyzed. He also had 12 rib fractures, three thoracic fractures, two arm fractures and a ruptured spleen, among other injuries. The crash changed everything for Benedict, his wife, whom he met while serving in Iraq, and their two daughters.
“Mr. Benedict is a wheelchair-bound quadriplegic and is dependent on assistance for all of his activities of daily living,” said Halpern of Halpern Santos & Pinkert in Coral Gables. ”Despite his injuries, he is delightful, positive and uplifting to anyone he encounters. He works hard for every morsel of function he can obtain.”
Halpern was brought into the Virginia federal lawsuit by local counsel Jonathan Halperin, who chose him not only for his tire expertise but also for the similarity of their names. Each lawyer leads a three-attorney firm, and they knew they were facing a tough opponent represented by the 3,600-lawyer firm DLA Piper. The company, whose U.S. headquarters is in Tennessee, has a reputation for not settling cases, Halpern said.
“Hankook is known for sort of a scorched-earth playbook: Challenge everything, fight everything, present as many obstacles as possible, make it as time-consuming and expensive as possible,” he said.
The tire company and DLA Piper attorneys Joel Dewey and Steven Har did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Plaintiffs counsel's first challenge was rooting out the cause of the tire explosion. They hired tire expert David Southwell of Australia, who did a detailed analysis of the tire and determined it was an accident waiting to happen.
The 9-year-old tire still had plenty of tread left, Halpern said. But Southwell found manufacturing defects that caused the tire to have incomplete adhesion. The inner liner of the tire was too thin, and patterns were visible in the rubber inside the tire that showed it hadn't been fully vulcanized or “cooked,” according to Southwell.
At trial before U.S. District Judge Robert Payne in Richmond, Virginia, defense counsel argued the tire hit something about 200 miles before Benedict's crash, leading to the blowout. The defense expert pointed to a broken belt in the tire as evidence of a prior impact.
The plaintiffs lawyers said the tread and other belts on that part of the tire were pristine: “We argued that it defied the laws of physics for belt No. 2 to be broken from some outside force without the tread and the other two belts that are above belt No. 2 showing any sign of impact or breakage,” Halpern said.
It was challenging to make the “subtle and arcane” details of tire forensics understandable to a jury, Halpern said. The plaintiffs lawyers knew Hankook had won cases like this: The team traveled to Tennessee to watch a similar trial about a flipped cement mixer with a Hankook tire, which resulted in a defense verdict.
But the jury ultimately gave the plaintiff every penny requested, amounting to about $37.8 million. Halpern credited the judge for being meticulous and discerning about excluding evidence submitted by both parties that he deemed extraneous. Halpern also said his client was a joy to represent.
“When I came to the courthouse every day … I was sleep-deprived, and he was always pleasant when he greeted me and when he dealt with anyone, including the defense lawyers,” Halpern said. “He treated them with great respect and kindness and a pleasant attitude. I was very motivated to work for this client because he had such catastrophic injuries but such a great spirit.”
Case: Robert Benedict v. Hankook Tire et al
Case No.: 3:17-cv-00109-REP
Description: Product liability
Filing date: Feb. 3, 2017
Verdict date: March 9, 2018
Judge: U.S. District Judge Robert Payne
Plaintiffs attorneys: Jay Halpern, Ernesto Santos and Ian Pinkert, Halpern Santos & Pinkert, Coral Gables; Jonathan Halperin, Andrew Lucchetti and Isaac McBeth, Halperin Law Center, Glen Allen, Virginia
Defense attorneys: Joel Dewey, Baltimore, Steven Har, New York, DLA Piper; Martin Conn and Matthew Hundley, Moran Reeves Conn, Richmond, Virginia
Verdict amount: $37.8 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1After Helene and Milton, What Litigation Is On the Horizon?
- 2Medtronic in the Crosshairs: 3 Suits Claim IP and Employee Poaching
- 3150 Plaintiffs and Counting: Asbestos Litigators Sue De Beers Empire
- 4Next Likely EU Competition Hints at Priorities in 3-Hour Confirmation Hearing
- 5Tampa Jury Awards $5.2 Million to Woman After Car Crash Leads to Emergency Spinal Surgery
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250