Specialization at Weiss Serota Still Giving Midsize Firm an Edge
The firm promotes itself as having the expertise and capability of big firms, while still having the efficiencies of a midsize firm.
January 16, 2018 at 06:32 PM
4 minute read
Mitch Burnstein, managing director of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman in Miami.
When three Am Law 100 lawyers formed Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman in 1991, they chose to specialize in an area they saw needed better representation: South Florida's public sector.
As the region's legal market evolved to include competition from plenty of Am Law 100 firms, Weiss Serota thrived in part by marketing itself on that philosophy of specialization, according to the firm's new managing partner, Mitch Burnstein.
The firm boasts 70 attorneys and clients that include dozens of municipalities, as well as corporate and private clients, on matters ranging from government relations to real estate land use, and from communications to government law.
Burnstein said being a midsize firm is an advantage in that space because it allows the firm to be nimble and responsive to client needs instead of trying to cover every practice area like many larger firms. The firm promotes itself as having the expertise and capability of big firms, while still having the efficiencies of a midsize firm.
Burnstein, a former Broward County assistant state attorney and Florida assistant state attorney general, grew up in the area and now specializes in eminent domain. He took Weiss Serota's reins earlier this month after 10 years as the firm's Broward office managing partner. Burnstein grew up in Hollywood in a home where both his parents were lawyers. His mother was Broward County's first female circuit judge.
Burnstein said the Weiss Serota management philosophy is based on the understanding that the firm includes lawyers that could be at Am Law 100 firms.
“Our lawyers have options, so from a management standpoint we do emphasize providing opportunity for career advancement,” Burnstein said.
Part of retaining and attracting staff involves being aware of workplace trends. For example, today's employees, particularly younger millennials, change jobs and industries more frequently and demand greater flexibility in the workplace.
“Employees have a different mindset in the aftermath of the Great Recession and health insurance crisis and travel demands,” he said. “Employees demand greater flexibility in their workplace. … We want to provide opportunities to them. We provide independence and flexibility. We try to mentor and foster collaboration.”
One way the firm is trying to give its lawyers independence and flexibility is with technology.
“Since people are out and about, particularly young attorneys, it would be nice to make time entries for billable time on a smartphone,” Burnstein said. “We're beta testing an app that integrates with our time management software to allow them to manage their time and bill their time via a smartphone.”
The firm is also changing its 401(k) platform, and one of the requirements for the new platform is that plan participants are able to change their investment elections and contributions through their smartphones.
He said the firm is undergoing an information technology audit to protect itself from any issues that may bring.
While mid-career employees like Burnstein, who is 53, aren't likely to change their 401(k)s on their phones, younger employees want that option.
The firm has also converted its kitchen areas, turning them into collaborative cafes with refreshments, surrounded by art and areas with comfortable couches and round tables to encourage collaboration and discussion of cases, clients and even weekend plans, Burnstein said.
“We find that we get more bang for the buck through collaboration,” he said. “In the long run, we find that the work and the mentorship that is being delivered is enhanced.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
4 minute read3 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
3 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250