Greenberg Traurig Team Wins Reversal of $30M Judgment Against Small Town
A long-running fight over commercial development in a bedroom community leaves Ponce Inlet victorious.
December 11, 2017 at 06:00 AM
12 minute read

Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samole
Greenberg Traurig
In a twist on bet-the-company litigation, Greenberg Traurig appellate shareholders
Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samole prevailed in bet-the- town litigation.
Ponce Inlet in Volusia County was found liable on federal and state takings claims when it was sued by a would-be developer who maintained the town unlawfully deprived him of development opportunities on 16 acres he owned after a series of purchases on the Halifax River. The plan would have greatly expanded commercial development in what is primarily a residential community.
The liability phase of the case was decided in a bench trial that resulted in a 50-plus page order finding in favor of Pacetta LLC and two related companies on both sets of claims.
Scherker, co-chair of the firm's national appellate practice, and Cech Samole, were retained for the town's appeal. They started searching for legal error since the trial judge's factual findings are presumed to be correct on appeal.
The first appeal was a successful interlocutory review of the judgment on state-law claims. On remand, the case went to a jury trial on the federal claims and produced a $30 million judgment including prejudgment interest against the town of 3,200 people. That works out to about $9,400 per person.
On a second appeal, Scherker and Cech Samole secured a reversal of the judgment in June, which came with a ruling that the developer had no viable total takings claim. A request for rehearing was denied.
The case was remanded for retrial only on a partial takings claim involving one parcel, which is a fraction of the initial claim and one that the trial team vigorously will defend.
The legal team attended town council meetings as the litigation proceeded. The attorneys felt the pressure to prevail was palpable at the each meeting, and many townspeople turned out in force for court hearings.

Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samole
In a twist on bet-the-company litigation,
Elliot H. Scherker and Brigid F. Cech Samole prevailed in bet-the- town litigation.
Ponce Inlet in Volusia County was found liable on federal and state takings claims when it was sued by a would-be developer who maintained the town unlawfully deprived him of development opportunities on 16 acres he owned after a series of purchases on the Halifax River. The plan would have greatly expanded commercial development in what is primarily a residential community.
The liability phase of the case was decided in a bench trial that resulted in a 50-plus page order finding in favor of Pacetta LLC and two related companies on both sets of claims.
Scherker, co-chair of the firm's national appellate practice, and Cech Samole, were retained for the town's appeal. They started searching for legal error since the trial judge's factual findings are presumed to be correct on appeal.
The first appeal was a successful interlocutory review of the judgment on state-law claims. On remand, the case went to a jury trial on the federal claims and produced a $30 million judgment including prejudgment interest against the town of 3,200 people. That works out to about $9,400 per person.
On a second appeal, Scherker and Cech Samole secured a reversal of the judgment in June, which came with a ruling that the developer had no viable total takings claim. A request for rehearing was denied.
The case was remanded for retrial only on a partial takings claim involving one parcel, which is a fraction of the initial claim and one that the trial team vigorously will defend.
The legal team attended town council meetings as the litigation proceeded. The attorneys felt the pressure to prevail was palpable at the each meeting, and many townspeople turned out in force for court hearings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
6 minute read
Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute read
Real Estate Trends to Watch in 2025: Restructuring, Growth, and Challenges in South Florida
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250