Food Fight Led by Public Interest Law Firm Ends Well for Skim Milk-Making Dairy
Justin Pearson and Ari BargilInstitute for Justice Florida Mary Lou Wesselhoeft of Ocheesee Creamery wanted her skim milk to be labeled…
December 11, 2017 at 06:00 AM
2 minute read

Justin Pearson and Ari Bargil
Institute for Justice Florida
Mary Lou Wesselhoeft of Ocheesee Creamery wanted her skim milk to be labeled just that.
Fat-soluble Vitamin A is skimmed off with the lighter fat when cream is removed to make skim milk, and Ocheesee's additive-free commitment meant it wouldn't replace the vitamins.
But the state Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services insisted on a label saying “imitation” or “milk product” because Wesselhoeft didn't replenish the lost vitamins as required by state regulations. Two stop-sale orders were issued in 2012.
The all-natural milk producer in rural Calhoun County“ felt like she was banging her head against the wall,” Justin Pearson, managing attorney of the Institute for Justice Florida office, wrote in a motion. The Miami office is part of a nonprofit libertarian public interest law firm based in Virginia.
State Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam was sued in 2014 for rejecting five proposed labels.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle rejected a First Amendment claim of protected commercial speech and issued a summary judgment in favor of the state.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed him in March, ruling “the Creamery's label does not concern unlawful activity and is not inherently misleading.”
In litigation over fees, the state asked for a reduction, claiming the creamery met with only limited success. Hinkle concluded, “As a practical matter, the plaintiff prevailed completely.”
Florida has agreed to pay $428,855 in legal fees to the pro bono attorneys who beat the state,
Pearson called the decision “the first of a kind in litigation regarding food labels.”
Milk has been a point of contention for the Institute for Justice before. Its defense of an Oregon dairy that produced raw milk fought an advertising ban with state regulators, and the Legislature repealed the ban in 2015.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Close Our Borders?' Senate Judiciary Committee Examines Economics, Legal Predicate for Mass Deportation Proposal
3 minute read

'Stab Venequip in the Back': Caterpillar Faces $100M Lawsuit in Miami Federal Court
3 minute read
Another Roundup Trial Kicks Off in Missouri. Monsanto Faces 3 Plaintiffs
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250