Creditors' Rights: How to Deal With Debt and Today's Hottest Rap Stars
Bling and drama are two words that come to mind when one thinks of today's rap stars. However, a third more common word seems to permeate this genre of musicians and performers–that is debt. Whether it is due to a feeling of entitlement, a result of being surrounded by inept handlers or just plain old theft can be debated, but the fact remains that the failure of many of such performers to pay their bills is epidemic.
November 21, 2017 at 10:19 AM
5 minute read
Bling and drama are two words that come to mind when one thinks of today's rap stars. However, a third more common word seems to permeate this genre of musicians and performers–that is debt. Whether it is due to a feeling of entitlement, a result of being surrounded by inept handlers or just plain old theft can be debated, but the fact remains that the failure of many of such performers to pay their bills is epidemic. The artists include some of the biggest names in entertainment today.
In order to avoid becoming the victim, the burden is on the creditor to know who he or she is dealing with. Many of these artists just don't pay those rightfully entitled to payment. It is easy for them to do so because for every creditor there are dozens of other vendors, prospective employees and service providers who so desperately want to be part of the scene, they are oblivious to the fact that they will fall victim to the fame and supposed fortune of these individuals.
Clearly, part of the problem stems from the fact that such artists do not make as much money as musicians and performers made years ago when record companies would throw boat loads of cash at the successful ones. The problem is further compounded by the fact that there are too many hands partaking in an ever-diminishing pot. By the time the artist's agents, managers, attorneys, co-writers and others get their cut, not much is left for the artist. Moreover, the artists themselves are part of a society where they are expected to exude wealth and project the image that they have arrived. To do so, they must be clothed in expensive and pretentious jewelry, live in expensive homes and drive expensive cars. All that takes money, which is in shorter supply than before.
Additionally, many of these artists came from humble backgrounds and have no appreciation for the money they are now earning. Others have had criminal backgrounds and even after they have left such lives behind, they still cannot detach themselves from the mindset of their past.
So how does a creditor of today's rap stars address this newfound reality? First, it is critical that a written instrument be procured and signed by the star or by someone with a power of attorney. Accepting the signature of anyone else leaves the door open to a defense that that person had no actual or apparent authority to bind the start. Second, and most obvious, is getting money up front. In reality, that might be the only payment the creditor ever sees. If the creditor is selling something to the star, a security interest would certainly be helpful. However, because there are too many other vendors who might be willing to do business without it, most likely one will not be obtainable. But more importantly, it is imperative that a prospective creditor gain an appreciation for the star's background and those who are his or her handlers. There are numerous databases where backgrounds can be checked and the internet is a treasure trove of information as well. Court databases in the cities where these stars live and work are also replete with information as to lawsuits they have been involved in and many states have judgment lien registries to determine where you will stand in line if you are forced to initiate legal proceedings. If payments are not being processed by a star's handlers, a creditor should attempt to try to reach the star directly. Frequently, celebrities don't have a handle on their financial affairs.
If you are forced to litigate, you may be in litigation for the long haul. Since the artists are always on the road and difficult to pin down, it is oftentimes difficult to serve them with process and then when that is accomplished, it is even more difficult to schedule their depositions and conduct discovery. Many of the stars who are intentionally not paying will direct their attorneys to put up every roadblock and use every delay tactic available in an effort to avoid payment including dilatory and meritless counterclaims. Another layer of difficulty a creditor must dig through are musician's use of shell corporations for their management and production. The use of such entities requires that they be brought in as parties. Consequently, if a judgment is secured against them, additional effort is required to try to pierce the entity to get to its officers or managers individually or alternatively to find its assets.
Moreover, due to the publicity many of these cases get, the rap stars feel that they need to protect their image and be looked favorably upon in the court of public opinion. First, you have to deal with what are some pretty large egos. Second, you have to deal with a mindset where total exoneration is the only outcome the rap star will find acceptable, even if it is one that will never be achieved. At the end of the day, we all assume that justice will prevail and when it does, there will be plenty of bling to pursue to satisfy the judgment obtained.
Andrew Dector, a shareholder with Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann, of Boca Raton, has represented clients in commercial litigation in both state and federal courts and in arbitration and mediation for more than three decades. Contact him at 561-477-7800 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning Down the Rancor Around DEI: Re-embracing the Value of—and Values Behind—Workplace Diversity Programs
6 minute readWill Ohtani's 50/50 Ball Be Split 50/50? Fla. Court to Decide Owner of $4.5M Disputed Catch
How the Legislature Can Fix the Middle-Income Affordable Housing Exemption in Fla.'s Live Local Act
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250