"Even though the providers made that claim, it is apparent that the insurance carriers continued to charge premiums for malpractice," Robert C. Lubus Jr. of Grady & Riley said. "Here, the Connecticut Supreme Court made it clear that in order to use the executive order as a shield, the malpractice had to have some relation to COVID or to a lack of resources caused by COVID. The facts of our case are such that we are confident that the nursing home will never be able to sustain this burden."
August 18, 2023 at 12:18 PM
6 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled a COVID-19-era executive order, which granted immunity to health care professionals as the novel virus spread, did not apply in two medical malpractice cases.
The companion cases, Manginelli v. Regency House of Wallingford and Mills v. Hartford HealthCare, alleged wrongful death due to medical negligence.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New England Legal Awards serves as a testament to the outstanding contributions and achievements made by legal professionals.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Credit: ETAJOE/Shutterstock.com
