Connecticut Lawyers Brace for Sharp Drop in Income This Year
"You have to be resilient," said BerkowitzHanna shareholder Christina Hanna. "We are in this for the long haul, no matter what."
May 26, 2020 at 07:21 AM
3 minute read
With few new cases reaching their offices amid stay-at-home orders and mandated lockdowns, Connecticut personal injury attorneys expect a significant drop in income, according to new data from a national survey.
ALM Media, whose publications include Law.com and the Connecticut Law Tribune, conducted a nationwide survey between April 1 and 23. It asked attorneys how the coronavirus outbreak has impacted their income, how their new-case volume has changed, and what is happening with potential new clients seeking representation. There were 24 Connecticut attorneys out of 292 total respondents.
Of the Connecticut attorneys, 58% reported they'd already seen a decrease in income due to COVID-19, while 33% said their income had stayed the same.
For Stewart M. Casper, a partner at Casper & de Toledo in Stamford, three recent cases he has been litigating have just brought in "substantial fees." But with courthouses closed, a key revenue driver for Casper's personal injury practice is the pressure that the offer-of-compromise statute puts on insurance companies to settle.
"When it is not paid, the interest rate runs at 8%, and that could be retroactive to the filing of the lawsuit," Casper said. "It becomes a business decision at some point for the insurance companies. That's why the offer-of-compromise statute that we have needs to be used, and needs to be used aggressively to disincentivize stonewalling."
The pandemic has led to economic hardships as unemployment climbed across the United States. As for Casper, "this is year is going to be a good year," thanks to recent case recoveries.
But most lawyers who took part in the survey did not share his view.
|'You have to be resilient'
Of the Connecticut respondents, 63% are projecting decreased income in the future, while only 8% thought their income would remain the same.
When ALM asked them to quantify how much they felt they would lose in the future, 18% said they expected a 21% to 30% income drop. A plurality—about 35%—were bracing to lose between 11% and 20%, while about 18% expected their income to drop 10% or less.
The numbers confirm a sobering reality for Christina Hanna, a shareholder at BerkowitzHanna in Shelton, who has heard similar projections from colleagues at large and small firms, as well as solo offices within the state.
In her own practice, Hanna says she has seen a drop-off in new personal injury cases—as most of America is sheltered indoors—which will have an adverse effect on her income.
Although Hanna is receiving some new calls from potential clients, she is worried that cases before the coronavirus outbreak will soon be resolved, and a prolonged slowdown in new personal injury cases may meaningfully decrease her future revenue streams. As a result, she said she and other attorneys are exploring new types of claims.
"We're looking for any COVID-exposure cases, issues in the workplace or malpractice claims," Hanna said. "So that could be a new area developing. You have to be resilient. We are in this for the long haul, no matter what."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudges Say Social Media and Political Polarization Puts Them in Danger
Turning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readRupert Murdoch Trust Trial Underscores Lucrative Nature of High-End Private Client Practices
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250