Judge Peck: There’s Still a Misconception That Eyes-On Review is the ‘Gold Standard’
As part of the Legalweek 2020 Q&A series, Legaltech News speaks with retired federal judge Andrew Peck on issues with biometric data, the 502(d) order’s “get out of jail free” card, and more.
Retired federal judge Andrew Peck has seen technology make its way into the courts, in part due to his own rulings promoting technology-assisted review (TAR) in e-discovery in 2012’s Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe and 2015’s Rio Tinto v. Valle. However, he says there is still work to be done to integrate technology into the law, not only in the discovery process, but in archiving and information governance, privacy concerns around new data sources like biometrics, and more.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.
Benefits of a Digital Membership:
- Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
- Access to the entire ALM network of websites
- Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
- Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
- Search by a wide range of topics
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account? Sign In Now