X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Connecticut Supreme court building in Hartford. Connecticut Supreme court building in Hartford. Photo: Natalia Bratslavsky/Shutterstock.com

Citing the alternative liability doctrine as the crux of its decision in a fire liability case, the Connecticut Supreme Court on Friday reversed a Superior Court ruling, which had found the plaintiffs had not determined which of three adults had caused a fire that destroyed a mill and sewer line.

This premium content is locked for
Connecticut Law Tribune subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Robert Storace

Robert Storace covers legal trends, lawsuits and analysis for the Connecticut Law Tribune. Follow him on Twitter @RobertSCTLaw or reach him at 203-437-5950.

More from this author

 

Connecticut Appellate Practice ProcedureBook

Connecticut Appellate Practice is authored by Judge Eliot D. Prescott, who was appointed to the Connecticut Appellate Court by Governor Malloy in 2014.The book is 760...
Get More Information

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.