X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Tensions between the president of Saint Louis University and its faculty made an unexpected turn into the realm of copyright law—and the university’s general counsel is at the center of the storm.

According to the Riverfront Times, SLU VP and GC William Kauffman, “in an apparent attempt to stop a faculty survey on the embattled university president Father Lawrence Biondi, has threatened legal action against the professor drafting the survey. On what grounds? Copyright infringement.”

How did Missouri campus politics turn into a copyright fight? The St. Louis Beacon reports that in late March, “[a]s part of an effort designed to smooth over tensions that arose when faculty and student groups approved a no-confidence vote in [SLU President Rev. Lawrence] Biondi and told trustees he should be fired, the university issued a campus climate survey” that “was designed to give trustees a sense of what faculty, staff and students on campus thought in advance of the final board of trustees meeting of the academic year, scheduled for May 4.”

That survey went out on Monday, March 25. In a timeline laid out by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the next day “some faculty members said the wording on the survey doesn’t reflect the discontent with the school’s president . . . Their complaint was the survey contains only one question about ‘the president,’ and instead uses general references to ‘the university.’ “

And one day later, in the timeline, “the campus chapter of the American Association of University Professors [AAUP] announced it may release a parallel survey that would indeed replace ‘the university’ with ‘the president.’ “

Cue the GC.

On Thursday, March 28, as the supplemental survey was being prepared, Kauffman sent a letter to SLU professor Steven Harris, president of the SLU chapter of the AAUP. The RT posted the full letter here and noted this highlight:

“Be aware that the copying of, use of and/or reproduction of Saint Louis University’s copyrighted work is a violation of federal law. Moreover, the use of any derivative of the copyrighted works likewise constitutes an infringement of the University’s rights.

Any infringement will be addressed by the University and could result in legal action. In addition to injunctive relief, other available remedies include damages (either actual or statutory) and the possibility of an award of attorney fees under federal copyright law.”

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2017 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.