CFIUS Issues Enforcement and Penalty Guidelines: A Contextual View
The Guidelines serve as welcome transparency to industry as to how violations will be assessed.
November 14, 2022 at 03:08 PM
7 minute read
Although announced two years earlier, Enforcement and Penalty Guidelines were finally released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury as Chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) on Oct. 20, 2022. Pursuant to the Foreign Investment Risk Review Act of 2018, CFIUS has the mandate of identifying and mitigating certain national security risks while maintaining the U.S. openness to foreign investment. This, in turn, requires CFIUS to enter into agreements or impose conditions on transaction parties to mitigate risks to national security that arise from a transaction (mitigation agreements). The Treasury's Office of Investment Security (OIS) created the Monitoring & Enforcement office, which oversees these mitigation agreements and works with the other CFIUS member agencies to monitor transaction parties' compliance with their obligations and take any appropriate enforcement action that may be required. OIS is also vested with enforcement authority pursuant to §721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. §4565).
Timing and Purpose
The Guidelines serve as welcome transparency to industry as to how violations will be assessed. They also introduce a self-disclosure mechanism akin to that familiar to export controls practitioners. They also are a caution to parties considering a CFIUS filing, as well as to those who have previously filed or failed to file, that OIS intends to vigorously exercise its enforcement in protecting national security interests and U.S. technological lead time. We infer the foregoing from the most recent Annual Report to Congress, wherein CFIUS confirmed its intent to focus on improving compliance with mitigation agreements and conditions as well as to increase staffing dedicated to monitoring and enforcement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Ex-Six Flags CLO Lands New C-Suite Post—This Time as HR Chief
Trump Mulls Big Changes to Banking Regulation, Unsettling the Industry
As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250