Survey: Legal Departments Are Investing in Legal Operations
The addition of full-time legal operations employees also shows that majority of companies are making it a full-time job rather than a secondary job for an associate or deputy general counsel.
July 19, 2019 at 04:00 PM
3 minute read
Legal operations functions have grown steadily in the past year, and legal departments are placing a greater importance on legal operations, according to the results of a survey published Thursday by the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium.
“It's a very exciting time and we're all driving a lot of change and innovation and are curious to see where it all lands,” Mary O'Carroll, CLOC's president and director of legal operations at Google, said in an interview Friday.
The report shows that legal departments have an average of six full-time legal operations employees. Companies with revenues of $10 billion or more have an average 12 attorneys for every one legal operations professional. Midsize companies, with revenues of $1 billion to $9.9 billion, have 13 attorneys for every one legal operations professional, and small companies with less than $1 billion in revenue have six attorneys for every one legal operations professional.
“We also asked how many have you have grown your team and 39% of the respondents said they have grown their legal ops team in 2018,” O'Carroll said.
The addition of full-time legal operations employees also shows that majority of companies are making it a full-time job rather than a secondary job for an associate or deputy general counsel. The majority of respondents indicated that the person leading legal operations has a title of legal operations manager or director of legal operations. Only 5% of respondents said the general counsel is in charge of legal operations and only 2% of respondents said the associate general counsel is in charge of legal operations.
“You need a person to be dedicated to this if you want to really get the return on your investment. This is not something you can do on the side,” O'Carroll said.
The majority of legal operations professionals are reporting directly to the general counsel or the chief legal officer, according to the report. Twenty-one percent of respondents indicated legal operations reports to the deputy or associate general counsel. Sixty-five percent of respondents said legal operations reports to the general counsel. O'Carroll said reporting to the top of the legal department is critical.
“The legal operations lead is in a lot of ways executing and delivering on the vision and strategy of your GC or CLO,” O'Carroll said.
The data for the 2019 State of the Industry Report was collected from CLOC members at 213 companies spanning industries across 18 countries. This is the second year CLOC has published the survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManufacturing Group Urges Sweeping Environmental Deregulation in Letter to Trump
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Federal Judge Grants FTC Motion Blocking Proposed Kroger-Albertsons Merger
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'All About Case Selection': Small But Mighty Miami Firm Reflects on Decades of Success
- 2Visa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
- 3Supreme Court of Georgia Disbars 1, Reinstates 1
- 4New York City’s Failure To Pay Its Bills Is Putting Vulnerable New Yorkers in the Crosshairs
- 5Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250