The Weed GC: Culture Fit Matters
I just took my search firm's first order within the cannabis industry, a general counsel role for a leading grower of legal marijuana. Interest in the role is high (OK, the puns are easy!), but I've already rejected one of my favorite candidates.
April 04, 2019 at 12:28 PM
3 minute read
I just took my search firm's first order within the cannabis industry, a general counsel role for a leading grower of legal marijuana. Interest in the role is high (OK, the puns are easy!), but I've already rejected one of my favorite candidates.
The individual to whom I refer is a corporate attorney with regulatory expertise and a stellar resume. She is highly qualified. I asked for her thoughts about marijuana. She does not care for it personally, and confessed that she has concerns about its widespread legalization. Nonetheless, she welcomes the job as a career opportunity and said she can easily separate her role as an attorney from her personal tastes and views.
I think this brings up one of the biggest differences between an attorney's role as outside counsel versus in-house positions. Outside counsel can and should put up a wall between their personal views and their role as advocate for a client, whether that client is a corporation or individual. It's understood, expected and something that is actually addressed in law school.
When working in-house for a company, however, I strongly believe that the general counsel should be an all-in fan and supporter of the business. And while Jeff Spicoli is not qualified (I finally got to make a "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" reference!), I will indeed favor candidates who view weed positively without reservation. My client deserves that.
While nonlawyers typically self-select when job hunting based on what products or services interest them, lawyers are by training industry agnostic. Lawyers tend to focus more on the nature of the career opportunity than the business when considering a new position.
And so, I often need to play a bit of a spoiler role. Because I am only concerned about helping my corporate client make the best possible hiring choice. And I frustrate a lot of candidates when I pursue a line of questioning that goes beyond their qualifications to do the job. What I really want to know it this: Are you a good culture fit for my client? Will you get excited when talking about your company's products or services at the family reunion?
Culture fit has always been the focus of our work. Car junkies do well with our auto industry clients. When recruiting within financial services, I ask about the candidate's personal experience investing in the stock market. You must convince me that you have a passion for the business.
With respect to this cannabis company specifically, the winner was described to me not merely as someone who supports the product politically. Rather, my marching orders are to find candidates who want to be part of a "movement" and help build this particular industry. Passion is hard to fake. Be true to whatever your passions happen to be.
Mike Evers recruits attorneys for corporate legal departments throughout the United States. Visit www.everslegal.com. His firm also offers experienced in-house counsel to companies on an adjunct basis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
- 3The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 5What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250