A Day of Reckoning for Tech Giants? Here's Another View
Hogan Lovells' Logan Breed is among those antitrust lawyers who think the Federal Trade Commission's task force will trouble the technology giants. Also, in another sign the FTC is flexing its regulatory muscles, the trade commission has sent letters to seven big internet service providers demanding information on their data collection and privacy practices.
April 03, 2019 at 03:09 PM
5 minute read
While some antitrust practitioners are skeptical of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's announcement that its Bureau of Competition is convening a task force to monitor competition among the tech giants including Alphabet Inc.'s Google, Facebook and others, as reported last month, that view is hardly universal.
And since then, the FTC also announced it has demanded information from seven big broadband internet service providers last week on their data collection and privacy practice and procedures.
Hogan Lovells' Logan Breed is among the antitrust lawyers who think the FTC task force will be consequential and isn't mere window-dressing in response to political pressure.
Breed, a partner in the firm's Washington, D.C., regulatory group, said the 17-member task force is likely at a minimum to tie up many hours of inside and outside counsels' time and effort with investigations of past deals and future ones, even if the likelihood of the FTC actually going to court to unwind deals like Facebook's 2012 acquisition of Instagram is small. Facebook recently announced plans to integrate WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram.
“I know the leadership at the agency is committed to making this a substantive working team that is going to be tasked with a broad range of potential issues they could pursue,” Breed said.
Breed attended the American Bar Association's annual spring meeting last week in D.C., where the FTC commissioners and the director of the Bureau of Competition talked about the types of issues that they envision the task force addressing, he said. All of them indicated that they believed it could take on everything from backward-looking reviews of consummated mergers to unilateral conduct investigations involving the acquisition or maintenance of monopoly power to investigations of new mergers.
Breed said that as an indication of what FTC's new leadership thinks this task force could accomplish, they also referred back to FTC's 2002 Merger Litigation Task Force, which in addition to reviewing the agency's approach to litigation, resulted in a legal challenge to a hospital merger.
“I would expect that tech companies will be on notice that their conduct and possibly their past mergers and future mergers will be under more scrutiny because of this task force than they were before,” he said, adding that companies called on the carpet might have to endure multiyear probes.
“It is expensive to defend an FTC investigation,” he said. “It is going to take time, money and attention from other things those companies were going to be doing.” Short of a court challenge, he said, the task force could also make an impact “if the task force would come up with new theories of harm, new ways to apply antitrust laws in the tech industry, or something else that expands the issues the FTC plans to address in the future.”
FTC Broadband Inquiry
Meanwhile, in more evidence of increased regulatory scrutiny, the Federal Trade Commission on March 26 demanded information from seven of the largest broadband internet service providers, or ISPs, including Verizon, AT&T and Comcast about their data collection and privacy practices, including specifically what kind of data about consumers the companies are collecting from their devices, whether it is being shared with third parties and whether they have disclosed to their customers what they are doing. They are also asking about their policies for letting customers examine, correct or delete their personal information.
The orders were sent to: AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Comcast Cable Communications doing business as Xfinity, Google Fiber Inc., T-Mobile US Inc., Verizon Communications Inc., and Cellco Partnership Inc. doing business as Verizon Wireless, according to the FTC.
“The FTC is initiating this study to better understand Internet service providers' privacy practices in light of the evolution of telecommunications companies into vertically integrated platforms that also provide advertising-supported content,” the agency said in a statement. “Under current law, the FTC has the ability to enforce against unfair and deceptive practices involving Internet service providers.”
The Federal Communications Commission passed ISP privacy rules under the Obama administration requiring consumers to opt-in consent to use or sell customer data that could be used for targeted ads. But they were rolled back when the Trump administration took office in 2017 and reversed a 2015 agency decision to reclassify broadband internet access as a common carrier service regulated by the FCC and repealed net neutrality. That returned oversight of consumer privacy of broadband, wireless and internet companies to the FTC under a memorandum of understanding between the agencies.
The FTC's action comes as pressure is building from privacy advocacy groups and in state and federal legislatures for more consumer protections on users' personal data.
Read More:
Tech M&A Counsel Can Take Precautions as Regulators Propose Reversing Approved Deals
The New FTC Task Force: Will Tech Giants Face a Day of Reckoning on Antitrust?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
3 minute read‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
6 minute readSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250