Report: GDPR-Compliant Companies Experience Shorter Sales Delays
Robert Waitman, director of data privacy at Cisco, said there are a variety of reasons why companies in compliance with the GDPR are seeing this trend.
February 06, 2019 at 06:43 PM
3 minute read
Companies complying with the requirements enforced by the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation are experiencing shorter delays in their sales cycle as it relates to customer data and are, on average, experiencing fewer data breaches, according to a recent report published by Cisco.
Robert Waitman, director of data privacy at Cisco, said there are a variety of reasons why companies in compliance with the GDPR are seeing this trend.
“What we've heard from companies that have their data house in order because of GDPR and other previous regulations is that they have taken steps to reduce the number of sensitive assets they have,” Waitman said.
The 2019 Data Privacy Benchmark Survey published by Cisco indicates that a majority of respondents from across the globe, 59 percent, are in full compliance or mostly in compliance with the GDPR. Twenty-nine percent of respondents said they will be ready within the year and 9 percent of respondents said it would take them more than a year to be ready to comply with the GDPR. Three percent of respondents said they do not believe they need to comply with the GDPR.
“Overall, 97 percent of companies feel they need to comply,” Waitman explained. “The fact that the GDPR has such a global reach was striking.”
The report further showed that customer concerns over data privacy issues have put a hold on sales. Eighty-seven percent of companies have indicated that they have had delays in selling to customers because of data privacy concerns. Although the amount of time of those delays has gone down from last year, the delays found in 2018 were, on average, 7.8 weeks while companies experienced sales delays of 3.9 weeks. The average delay for a “GDPR-ready” company is only 3.4 weeks while those not in compliance yet with the GDPR is 5.4 weeks, according to the report.
“Firms are more open and transparent earlier in the sales cycle and they're getting better at answering those GDPR questions from customers,” Waitman said.
The reality is that most companies will experience some kind of data breach. A majority of the companies reported having a data breach in the past year. However, a lower percentage of GDPR-ready companies, only 74 percent, were impacted by data breaches. This is compared to 89 percent of the companies that are least ready for GDPR. Only 37 percent of GDPR-ready companies experienced data breaches that cost over $500,000 in the last year, compared to 64 percent of the least GDPR-ready companies.
The double-blind survey was sent to companies of all sizes across all industries with 3,200 companies from 18 countries responding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readWells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readMLB's Texas Rangers Search for a New GC and a Broadcasting Deal
Trending Stories
- 1Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
- 2Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
- 3Democracy in Focus: New York State Court of Appeals Year in Review
- 4In Vape Case, A Debate Over Forum Shopping
- 5SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250