New Social Media Sleuth on the Scene: E-Discovery Company Touts AI Tech
Hanzo, a New York-based company, has introduced an artificial intelligence e-discovery tool that scours for social media posts, including hidden ones.
October 17, 2018 at 03:55 PM
4 minute read
Social media evidence is increasingly presented in civil lawsuits such as Romano v. Steelcase, in New York, in which a plaintiff claimed an on-the-job injury rendered her unable to move but her Facebook and MySpace profile photos of an active vacation told a different story.
Prosecutors in Chicago also secured a conviction and a 17-year prison sentence several years ago against an alleged gunrunner with the help of Facebook photos that showed him posing with large amounts of cash, flashy vehicles and dozens of firearms.
Plenty of other examples of social media activity being admitted as evidence and wielded for legal leverage are out there. And the list is growing by the day.
Right now, private investigators are handling the bulk of the social media sleuthing for legal clients. But New York-based electronic-discovery company Hanzo is trumpeting a new, more efficient solution that relies on artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Legaltech News talked with Keith Laska, a board member of Hanzo, about the company's investigatory software and how it might change social media-focused e-discovery.
How it works: By automating the traditionally manual investigation process, Hanzo Investigator for eDiscovery can rapidly search for and identify social media profiles and posts for a specific person and collect that relevant web content, whether it be a Facebook post or a photo on Instagram, according to Laska.
The process begins with a “capture form” that includes search keywords and other criteria that Hanzo's AI technology uses as if it were a virtual bloodhound sniffing a piece of clothing before sprinting out onto the web to track a person down.
The end result is a timeline complete with geolocation mapping that “provides a story about what you were doing, where you were and what you were saying,” Laska said. And law firms, lawyers and other clients can review the end product as if they were looking at an actual live post or website.
“We make an exact replica,” Laska added, “a replayable version of websites and social media.”
Why is it needed? Relying on smart, automated investigatory software rather than a human investigator can be more efficient and yield more accurate and thorough results, Laska contends.
But he contends the biggest benefit of the technology is that it removes bias from the equation by setting the human investigator aside and letting a machine do the digging.
“The system is unbiased,” Laska argued. “It moves faster than humans. It doesn't sleep. And it ultimately helps find that smoking gun or needle in the haystack that forensic investigators are looking for. It scorches the earth to find things.”
What about privacy concerns? Laska said the “platform is designed to only collect public-facing information.” However, he acknowledged that it could inadvertently scoop up leaked private data, which could raise some novel legal issues.
Competition: Hanzo competes with several other companies that offer e-discovery collection and archiving services, such as PageFreezer, Page Vault, Smarsh and X1 Social Discovery. But they don't offer the same type of automated investigatory software that Hanzo has unleashed on the marketplace, he said.
“We try to stay away from investigations for the most part,” said Wes Newman, a customer success manager at Page Vault in Chicago. “Typically, when law firms or attorneys come to us they have someone picked out and have a Facebook profile and just need the information collected at that point.”
But when the target of an investigation has a more elusive digital footprint, Hanzo Investigator can find even the faintest social media trails, according to Laska.
“Applying AI and data science is way ahead,” he said. “We're talking 'Jetsons' stuff compared to 'Flintstones.'”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
Aggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-CFO of San Francisco Law Firms Pleads Guilty to $1.3M Embezzlement Scheme, DOJ Announces
- 2What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 3Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 4US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 5‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250