Law Department Talent Pipeline: Evolving?
This generation of law students is more keenly aware of practice options other than law firms, and some of the better students are reluctant to follow the traditional path even when it's available to them.
September 10, 2018 at 12:04 PM
3 minute read
My role as a recruiter for corporate law departments is pretty straightforward: Bring specifically qualified candidates to bear, assess culture fit, and provide a short list of the best options. We are usually working at the 7-plus years out of law school level, and the winners almost always arrive with a combination of “Big Law” firm teeth cutting and time spent in-house.
Nonetheless, I still hear clients talk about learning curves and the energy it often takes to bring any new lawyer into the fold. Sometimes a new hire has to unlearn prior habits. In those law departments that truly embrace technology, process and innovation, the word “retrain” has come into play.
Very few law departments develop entry-level talent. Interestingly, the best example of one doing so goes back about 20 years. The old New Jersey-based AT&T (not the AT&T of today that is Ameritech renamed), had a robust summer associate program and actually trained its own lawyers. It was a moment in time when one particular but significant law department decided that in-house practice was sufficiently different versus law firm practice and should be treated as a fully other path.
Now a new, small, adventurous nonprofit legal entity is taking a swing at the law department talent pipeline bat. It's a law school-driven enterprise, which makes sense, as many law schools are under tremendous pressure to give students options beyond law firm summer gigs that are increasingly hard for many of their students to land. In addition to which, this generation of law students is more keenly aware of practice options other than law firms, and some of the better students are reluctant to follow the traditional path even when it's available to them.
The effort is called “Institute for the Future of Law Practice” which, in plain English, is a highly structured and well thought through law student internship program. Two of my client companies, unrelated to our work for them, are participants. I also disclose that I am friends with one of the program organizers, and so I have invited other clients of mine to an informational gathering taking place on Sept. 12. Follow this link for details on that event. I have no skin in the game. In my role here as a career advice columnist, I simply suggest it's a development worth watching. It's interesting! And if you are a general counsel, it may be worth investigating the value of this for your department. I wonder if, in 10 years, I'll be recruiting candidates who cut their teeth as a law department intern and not as a junior law firm attorney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Disclosures Under the Spotlight: SEC Expectations for Year-End Filings
5 minute readA Blueprint for Targeted Enhancements to Corporate Compliance Programs
7 minute readThree Legal Technology Trends That Can Maximize Legal Team Efficiency and Productivity
Trending Stories
- 1Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
- 2Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
- 3Inside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
- 4Evidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250