New Initiative Aims for 100 Black GCs at Top Companies by 2025
The long-term goal is to increase the number of black in-house legal leaders in both public and private large companies.
May 16, 2018 at 03:41 PM
3 minute read
A group of former and current general counsel is setting some very specific goals to increase racial diversity in the top legal spots at some of the world's largest companies.
The 2025 Black GC Initiative initially hopes to increase the number of black GCs in Fortune 1000 companies (currently at 38) to five percent of the total Fortune 1000 group by 2020. By 2025, the aim is to grow the proportion of black GCs to 10 percent of the top company lawyers in the Fortune 1000.
The long-term goal is to increase the number of black in-house legal leaders in both public and private large companies.
“We want to be able to have a pool that is robust enough that we should be able to field some qualified black candidates for about any search that opens up out there,” said Ernest Tuckett, general counsel, Americas, at Akzo Nobel Inc. and co-leader of the initiative.
The initiative was sparked by a speech by Tuckett at an annual National Bar Association Corporate Counsel event last year about diversity in the in-house community and his call to action to improve those numbers. He suggested the value of setting some goals and discussing ways to reach them in eight years. Those who volunteered to do so met, and the effort was born.
Key to the initiative's effort is the identification of so-called “ready-now” black GC candidates. To be deemed ready now, however, the candidate must be nominated or sponsored by a current or former GC, a chief executive officer or an executive search firm, said April Miller Boise, senior vice president, CLO and corporate secretary at Meritor Inc. and the other leader of the initiative.
These ready-now candidates, Boise added, are identified based on ideal core criteria necessary to be a successful GC and developed by the group's advisory council. While acknowledging that “everyone's path to the GC chair is different,” Boise said the core criteria generally can be divided into three main categories: strong executive presence and interpersonal skills, significant technical legal expertise and experience, and excellent judgment.
Candidates who believe they are set to go are encouraged to compare their experience to the core criteria and discuss that analysis with GCs that they know and trust.
“I'm sure one of the reasons that this has really resonated with people is that these are very tangible goals to drive the needle,” Boise said. “This is not just networking. It is getting to know each other so that we have these relationships and can talk about the state of the profession and how we drive that change.”
Also integral to the effort is what's called a bio book, which includes short bios and headshots of GCs and ready-now candidates. Current GCs are included because many will be candidates for new and different top-lawyer roles—leaving openings for the ready-now lawyers.
As GC searches are conducted, selected bios may be presented by a member of the advisory council or other GCs to search firms and other potential employers for further discussion with target candidates.
“This is a good opportunity to make sure that our candidates who are ready now would be on the slate for these executive recruiters,” said Tuckett.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Climate-Smart Beef'?: DC Lawsuit Accuses Tyson Foods of False Advertising
3 minute readVandana Dhamija on Navigating the 'Politics and Personalities' of In-House Tech Procurement
Are Companies Given Deferred-Prosecution Deals Scared Straight? Boeing Odyssey Adds to Doubts
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250