When it Comes to Diversity, Female GCs Want More Than Mere 'Tokenism' From Outside Firms
At the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's annual institute in Las Vegas, top female in-house lawyers explained what they want from outside firms. To impress these powerful attorneys, it's clear law firms will need to practice what they preach on diversity.
April 23, 2018 at 07:31 PM
4 minute read
The Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's focus on gender equity in the legal field carried over to the second day of its annual institute, with a Monday morning panel featuring big name female GCs talking about how they deal with outside counsel.
Moderator Ahmed Shaaban, founding member of legal tech firm Fulcrum Global Technologies, spoke with a panel of four female in-house leaders about what they're looking for in outside firms and how that's changed over time.
One characteristic that the legal leaders were certainly not looking for was a lack of true gender balance on outside counsel teams.
Janet McCarthy, the chief legal officer of Santa Fe Group, said there's one thing that can knock outside counsel pitches down a few notches in her book—tokenism. She said firms have sent five white male partners in to pitch her and brought along one young recently hired woman who wasn't suitable for the case, just to appear diverse.
“I would rather have you say, 'I don't have the right woman for the job,'” McCarthy said.
When women and members of other marginalized groups are on a team McCarthy's hired, she said she checks the bill to make sure they're being credited and paid fairly for the work they've done.
McCarthy, who works in London, also noted the recently revealed gender pay gaps at a number of U.K. law firms, and said lack of action to close those gaps could harm these firms' chances of landing business going forward. The firms were required to disclose gender wage gaps between most employees, though not specifically partners, under U.K. law.
Some British firms released partner salary gaps in an effort to boost transparency and accountability, though McCarthy said that of the 10 firms with the largest gap, only two have published partners' gender pay differences.
“If in these studies, they're not choosing to publish their partner numbers, what that suggests to me is [they're] not actually interested in engaging in a genuine partnership with us,” said Jennifer Warner, the vice president of legal for Columbia Sportswear Co., who also spoke on the panel. “If you were interested in a genuine partnership, you'd share that information.”
In addition to discussing the need for increased transparency, panelists mentioned other ways the old model of doing business with law firms may no longer work.
According to Warner, companies are moving away from relying only on big firms.
She said that there are now a plethora of alternative legal service options and boutique law firms competing for business with brand name firms. She said with increased competition, Big Law can no longer rely on existing client relationships alone to guarantee future work.
“What I tend to see with traditional law firms is they're not yet thinking in market terms,” Warner said. “They're just thinking in relationship terms … For me, that's not what I need or what I'm looking for anymore.”
What Warner is looking for, she said, are innovative firms with competitive rates, that seek to form authentic relationships with clients and perform efficient, high-quality work. But even something as simple as firms checking in to get feedback on their work or input for changes sets them apart, she said.
“To win that market for me, you need to be bringing something pretty special to the table. It can't just be relationship at an hourly rate, and I want innovation,” Warner said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Am Law 50's Runaway Rates Put Onus on Legal Departments to Stiffen Resistance
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
- 2Litigating the Written Word: Parol Evidence Rule and the Gist of the Action Doctrine in Fraud Claims
- 3Why Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
- 4The Legal Status of Presidential Diaries Must Be Clarified
- 5Litigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250