Singapore GCs Eyeing Higher Impact, Chief Executive Roles, Report Finds
General counsel in the city-state seem to be an ambitious bunch—and may have their eyes on the CEO or COO's chair.
April 19, 2018 at 04:46 PM
3 minute read
Singapore skyline. Unlimited RF.
Singapore-based GCs are seeing the fruits of their labor more than they did five years ago, according to a new report.
In their first joint Singapore General Counsel Report, global law firm CMS and the Singapore Corporate Counsel Association revealed that 18 percent of general counsel respondents in Singapore said they think their current work is having the greatest strategic value to their business.
This group said their influence among senior leaders is “very strong,” while another 60 percent of GCs said it is “strong.”
This is up from five years ago, when only 34 percent of GCs in Singapore felt their influence was “strong,” and only 5 percent believed their impact was “very strong.”
Moving forward, about 52 percent expect to be doing work of the highest level of strategic influence in the next five years.
“General counsel in Singapore have much in common with their counterparts elsewhere,” said the report, which was released on Wednesday. “Many of the findings mirror very closely what we've heard from GCs in Europe. That's not surprising in a business world that continues to embrace globalization.”
Some 60 percent of GCs felt that their influence within the boardroom was “strong,” and another 18 percent said it was “very strong.”
While this growing impact is promising for general counsel in Singapore, most GCs are looking to be even more involved in company strategy. In fact, nearly 20 percent of GCs surveyed said they intend to become a chief executive officer or chief operating officer someday.
According to the report, only about two-thirds of GCs plan to spend their whole career in the general counsel role.
The report also asked some of Singapore's in-house lawyers about goals and challenges on the job.
Among them was Rose Kong, head of legal at RGE. She said, “Measuring lawyers' contribution is still an issue with management. They struggle to grade us. Much of our work is subjective, but for them contribution is basically dollars. Some would like it if we did time sheets to benchmark our worth—and yet they like alternative fee arrangements with external lawyers. There's a disconnect there. It's hard to solve.”
Despite challenges ahead, “as a class, GCs are much more numerous, more influential and better respected than ever,” said Jonathan Warne, CMS' head of litigation and arbitration and lead partner on the firm's GC program. “The report clearly reflects the ambition and opportunities for GCs operating across the Asia-Pacific region.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLooming Legal Threats, the Murdochs' Influence Make Fox CLO Vacancy Both Alluring and Terrifying
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250