With Rise of Startup Culture, Millennials Are Moving In-House
Millennials are taking nontraditional paths by jumping into legal departments soon after graduation, particularly at startups and in Silicon Valley.
December 01, 2017 at 05:14 PM
7 minute read
Samantha Von Hoene, head of legal affairs with Enjoy Technology. Courtesy Photo.
Samantha Von Hoene was in an enviable position. It was her second year of law school at UC Hastings, and her hard work and good grades had secured her a summer internship at a midsized firm. It seemed she was on track for a promising, traditional career in law.
Until she turned it down.
To the shock of her professors, peers and most other people in her life, Von Hoene politely rejected the offer and went to Silicon Valley, interning in-house at a finance firm.
“Most people said, 'Oh Sam, you're so crazy, the rest of us are going to the law firm first, and we want to go in-house but [on] the traditional route,'” Von Hoene said. “It seemed like they'd already resigned themselves to this route. I was viewed as someone who was taking a different path.”
Three years later, that path's paid off. Now Von Hoene is the head of legal affairs at Enjoy Technology Inc., a tech startup that sends experts to deliver, install and explain how to use technology products from companies such as Sonos and AT&T Inc. to consumers. She's the only lawyer at the growing business, so she's getting hands-on experience with a variety of legal and business issues. She says there's never a dull moment.
“When I got to Enjoy there were no guidelines. It was like that [idea of] 'hey, we're scrappy and we want to move quickly and here's what we wanna do,'” she said. “I've spent the past two and a half years working with teams and internal clients. Over 50 percent of my day is in cross-functional and operational meetings.”
It's this type of fast-paced, hands-on action and innovation that's pulling more young lawyers in-house straight out of school, especially around Silicon Valley. The traditional route—sitting silently in meetings and handling grunt work at a firm for a few years—doesn't appeal to a generation that is known for a drive to find purpose and see tangible results in the workplace.
Lindsey Pollak, an expert and consultant on millennials, says the youngest members of the workforce don't want to wait 10 years for their turn. They want to make an impact now.
“I think finding a purpose and feeling connected to a purpose through your work has been a significant trend among a large portion of millennials,” Pollak said. “That doesn't mean previous generations didn't care about purpose, but we believed that purpose was something you achieved over time. What's new is the desire to feel an impact as soon as possible, to feel a purpose right away.”
Professors and career service professionals in the Bay Area have also noticed more students considering a straight-to-in-house route out of law school. UC Hastings College of the Law has even begun a Startup Legal Garage to match students with startup companies so they can get experience and contacts. Jessica Ourk, the school's Director for Employer Relations, says she's seen the number of students going directly in-house rise over the past six years.
Kirupa Pushparaj, head IP counsel at Square Inc. and an adjunct professor at Stanford Law School, is almost a millennial himself. He has seen a change in the way law students, especially in the Bay Area, look at their postgraduate options.
“I've been teaching for six years and every year, most people don't even want to go to a law firm anymore, which is such a radical shift from where it was 10 years ago,” Pushparaj said. “People want to get into government jobs and nonprofits as well. People want to find that purpose.”
And this influx of young, driven, purpose-seeking millennials is changing how in-house teams approach culture and problem solving. Their passionate approach, sources say, makes millennials more likely to speak up during meetings, express their opinions to superiors and take on learning new types of law.
“There used to be a time when people felt confined to their roles,” Pushparaj said. “At Square, [for instance], we don't feel like we're developing a strong trademark attorney, we like to develop people out as full on counsel. That sense of not wanting to be confined is a good shift in things, people feel their values are heard, their thoughts are heard.”
It's a cultural shift that works especially well at startups, where things tend to grow quickly and a small group of lawyers must be prepared for new and unique legal challenges. Smaller companies can give new in-house lawyers a bigger role that allows them to work with employees inside and outside of the legal department.
But it's not the only culture shift. Millennials, despite their constant access to smartphones, place more emphasis on work-life balance than a lot of their co-workers of other generations, says Pushparaj. Younger workers want to have a life outside of work, he says, and in-house jobs, particularly at startups, align better with those values than positions at firms. Work-life balance isn't just a discussion for employees with children anymore.
“In general, there is more of a focus on work-life balance,” Pushparaj said. “There's more flexibility. If you find better work-life balance in doing your stuff at 8 p.m, that's your decision. We hire people because we trust them.”
When they are in the office, however, millennials want more interaction with their colleagues. There's a desire to form real relationships with others at work to create a welcoming, exciting environment, sources say. That includes getting to know those in positions above them as mentors and equals, with more transparency than in previous generations.
“When I can go on the internet and tweet at world leaders, it's a disconnect when you can't go talk to the partner that's working on your deal,” Pollak said. “They're supposed to be colleagues and yet you have less access to them than people halfway across the world. That's challenging for millennials.”
Pollak understands millennials' temptation to skip the traditional law firm route to go directly in-house, but she's cautioned that young lawyers need to make sure they're not missing crucial steps in their career development for instant gratification.
“I'd caution anyone who wants to skip steps because a lot of those steps can be important building blocks to a career,” she said. “Make sure you aren't missing out on important things by not being in that firm culture.”
But for Von Hoene, taking a risk on going in-house is one she doesn't regret. In fact, it's one she hopes more young lawyers will consider when planning their career options after graduation.
“A hope of mine is that people in the industry start making pathways where others who are younger in their career have opportunities to prove themselves,” Von Hoene said. “This is a really exciting, new way of thinking. While young lawyers may not bring 10 years of experience, just fresh out of law school, they're hungry. They want to identify problems and figure out solutions, which is far more valuable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1In-House Moves of Month: Discover Fills Awkward CLO Opening, Allegion GC Lasts Just 3 Months
- 2Delaware Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 3'Go 12 Rounds' or Settle: Rear-End Collision Leads to $2.25M Presuit Settlement
- 42 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
- 5Japan Highlights Burr & Forman Director's 'Body Of Work' With Highest Honor
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250