Inside: Diversity, of course
A look inside one law firm's diversity program and the ongoing quest to be "diverse enough"
October 21, 2013 at 04:00 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Diversity: good.
It's not likely that anyone will disagree with that conclusion. In fact, most business concerns, including law firms, now ignore that accepted wisdom at their peril. Few organizations cannot wax eloquent on their commitment to diversity, and their sincerity is not to be doubted. Diversity is fairness personified. It's smart business policy. It's eventually inevitable in any multicultural society.
What's most important, though, is that diversity is acculturated. In other words, I believe diversity isn't really diversity until it's more than the product of each of those reasons above. And less.
Like most law firms that date back more than a hundred years, Quarles & Brady was not always diverse, but looking back at the last three or four generations of firm leadership, inclusiveness — the forbearer of diversity — became a key value of the firm while the legal industry as a whole continued to be fairly traditional in its culture and social norms. It was in 1974 that now-chairman emeritus John W. Daniels Jr. joined the firm, later becoming its first African-American partner, but the internal culture that would allow him to eventually become one of a scant few African-American Am Law 200 chairmen was already in place. Similarly, I am now one of an equally scarce contingent of women to head a national law firm.
From an external perspective, this level of diversity and/or inclusiveness apparently appears progressive, organizationally enlightened, even cutting-edge. Internally, however, an age-old spirit of meritocracy that has led to the placement of women, people of color, and other diverse-identifying attorneys in positions of authority, across the entire Quarles network, is nothing terribly new or even noteworthy at all. In fact, when I was elected to the chairmanship by my executive committee, the only person who thought it would be a big deal to the press was our director of marketing — to the rest of us, it was simply a matter of succession and election, and we were frankly surprised at the attention.
It may be our relative size as a law firm that so comfortably and artlessly established this ethos. Especially large law firms have particular concerns and drivers and widely dispersed locations, not to mention pure size, which may make it more difficult to establish a uniform culture across all offices, while boutiques are generally characterized by their principals and their individual perspectives on cultural norms. In the middle, we are small enough to care a great deal about how we interrelate, yet large enough to pursue and implement the kinds of programs that advance modern business ideals. A further contributing factor may be that Quarles & Brady was founded in the Midwest, where lineage and social status generally matter less than a handshake and a good job well done, which continues to characterize the entire firm's personality today.
To be sure, like many of our peers, we have pursued a host of programs over the years, designed to ensure that attorneys of all backgrounds receive all the support they need to succeed. We, too, actively recruit at law schools with diverse populations. We also join with clients to make diversity a priority, and demand similar attention from our own suppliers. But somewhere along the way, diversity became simply natural to us.
At the end of the day, like many of our fellow law firms, we find that we still aren't “diverse enough.” The hunt for talent of every background continues apace, and we are vigorous in our ongoing efforts to create and maintain an even playing field for women and diverse lawyers. Our diversity programming is calculated to eliminate inequalities so that we can all be equally successful. But we do it because it's in our firm's DNA, and that has allowed us to move beyond “diversity, good” and to the point of “diversity, of course.”
Diversity: good.
It's not likely that anyone will disagree with that conclusion. In fact, most business concerns, including law firms, now ignore that accepted wisdom at their peril. Few organizations cannot wax eloquent on their commitment to diversity, and their sincerity is not to be doubted. Diversity is fairness personified. It's smart business policy. It's eventually inevitable in any multicultural society.
What's most important, though, is that diversity is acculturated. In other words, I believe diversity isn't really diversity until it's more than the product of each of those reasons above. And less.
Like most law firms that date back more than a hundred years,
From an external perspective, this level of diversity and/or inclusiveness apparently appears progressive, organizationally enlightened, even cutting-edge. Internally, however, an age-old spirit of meritocracy that has led to the placement of women, people of color, and other diverse-identifying attorneys in positions of authority, across the entire Quarles network, is nothing terribly new or even noteworthy at all. In fact, when I was elected to the chairmanship by my executive committee, the only person who thought it would be a big deal to the press was our director of marketing — to the rest of us, it was simply a matter of succession and election, and we were frankly surprised at the attention.
It may be our relative size as a law firm that so comfortably and artlessly established this ethos. Especially large law firms have particular concerns and drivers and widely dispersed locations, not to mention pure size, which may make it more difficult to establish a uniform culture across all offices, while boutiques are generally characterized by their principals and their individual perspectives on cultural norms. In the middle, we are small enough to care a great deal about how we interrelate, yet large enough to pursue and implement the kinds of programs that advance modern business ideals. A further contributing factor may be that
To be sure, like many of our peers, we have pursued a host of programs over the years, designed to ensure that attorneys of all backgrounds receive all the support they need to succeed. We, too, actively recruit at law schools with diverse populations. We also join with clients to make diversity a priority, and demand similar attention from our own suppliers. But somewhere along the way, diversity became simply natural to us.
At the end of the day, like many of our fellow law firms, we find that we still aren't “diverse enough.” The hunt for talent of every background continues apace, and we are vigorous in our ongoing efforts to create and maintain an even playing field for women and diverse lawyers. Our diversity programming is calculated to eliminate inequalities so that we can all be equally successful. But we do it because it's in our firm's DNA, and that has allowed us to move beyond “diversity, good” and to the point of “diversity, of course.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250