Legal tabs for U.S. banks surpass $100 billion
The astronomical figure may just be the beginning of a larger discussion that evaluates what exactly the government has done to compensate victims of the financial crisis.
August 28, 2013 at 09:38 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the five years since the financial crisis, the top six largest banks in the U.S. – led by Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase – have racked up $103 billion in legal costs, more than all dividends paid to shareholders since 2008, according to Reuters.
Based on data compiled by Bloomberg, the sum exceeds the banks' combined profit last year – for payments to lawyers and litigation, as well as for settling claims about shoddy mortgages and foreclosures.
This astronomical figure may just be the beginning of a larger discussion that evaluates what exactly the government has done to compensate victims of the financial crisis.
As regulators, investors and prosecutors initiate new claims, the tally could surge even higher, according to investment analysts who do not recommend buying bank stocks.
“They've crossed the point of no return when it comes to the effects that these expenses are going to have on earnings,” Jeffrey Sica, who helps oversee more than $1 billion as head of Sica Wealth Management LLC in Morristown, N.J., told Bloomberg. “This is going to keep on hurting them, and people will start paying more attention.”
Moody's Investors Services recently placed the senior and subordinated debt ratings of the holding companies for the six largest U.S. banks on review as it considers reducing its government (or systemic) support assumptions to reflect the impact of U.S. bank resolution policies.
Four of them – Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo – are on review for downgrade. The other two – Bank of America and Citigroup – are on review direction uncertain, as the rating agency considers the potentially offsetting impact of improvements in the standalone strength of their main operating subsidiaries, the ratings on which were simultaneously placed on review for upgrade.
Bearing the brunt of the banks' total legal costs – which comprise about 75 percent – are JPMorgan and Bank of America. JPMorgan has allocated $21.3 billion to legal fees and litigation since the start of 2008, more than any other lender, and added $8.1 billion to reserves for mortgage buybacks.
According to a recent report issued by Cornerstone Research, 2013 has seen a precipitous increase in FDIC litigation against the directors and officers of failed financial institutions, even as new bank closures slow down and mortgage lending recovers. As of July 1, the agency had filed 19 suits in 2013 and was on pace to file 39 such lawsuits by year's end, the greatest number in a single year since the financial crisis began.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250