Time Warner Cable faces two class action suits over blackouts
For some, missing "Two and a Half Men" is so egregious that it has driven TV viewers to the point of litigation.
August 15, 2013 at 08:10 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
For some, being blacked out from watching “Two and a Half Men” is a blessing in disguise. But for others, the offense is so egregious that it has driven TV viewers to the point of litigation.
Time Warner Cable Inc., which has engaged in retransmission consent disputes with both CBS Corp. and Journal Broadcast Group, now faces two class action lawsuits for breach of contract in Los Angeles and Milwaukee. Time Warner subscribers in New York City, Los Angeles and Dallas have been without CBS programming since Aug. 2. Journal stations in six markets, including Milwaukee and Green Bay, have been blacked out since July 25.
On Wednesday, three Time Warner subscribers filed a class action suit in Los Angeles Superior Court. The plaintiffs said they would not have signed up for Time Warner service “if they had known CBS and Showtime were not available as part of the subscription services, or if they had been advised there was a possibility there would be a blackout of this programming.” They also claimed that the replacement broadcasts were “not a reasonable substitute” for CBS programming.
Journal Broadcast Group came after Time Warner as well on Wednesday, asking the Wisconsin attorney general to force the cable company to provide subscribers refunds for missed programming. Journal attorneys claim Time Warner “unilaterally removed” Journal channels even though the company “gave permission to continue carriage while the parties worked to negotiate a resolution.” This comes after Time Warner subscribers in Wisconsin filed a class action suit against the cable provider on Aug. 8, seeking a one-day credit for each day of service interruption.
At this time, Time Warner has had no comment on the pending class action suits. But on the Journal letter to the Wisconsin attorney general, Time Warner said: “We look forward to discussing with the Attorney General why the law cited by Journal Broadcasting Group does not apply in this situation, and why Journal persists in misleading its viewers in this way.”
For more on the Time Warner disputes, check out AdWeek.
And for more entertainment law, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
Judge dismisses racial bias claim against Paula Deen
Marvel can keep rights to the Fantastic Four and other comic book characters
Millennium Films wins copyright suit over “Lovelace”
10 ex-“American Idol” contestants sue show for racism
For some, being blacked out from watching “Two and a Half Men” is a blessing in disguise. But for others, the offense is so egregious that it has driven TV viewers to the point of litigation.
On Wednesday, three Time Warner subscribers filed a class action suit in Los Angeles Superior Court. The plaintiffs said they would not have signed up for Time Warner service “if they had known CBS and Showtime were not available as part of the subscription services, or if they had been advised there was a possibility there would be a blackout of this programming.” They also claimed that the replacement broadcasts were “not a reasonable substitute” for CBS programming.
Journal Broadcast Group came after Time Warner as well on Wednesday, asking the Wisconsin attorney general to force the cable company to provide subscribers refunds for missed programming. Journal attorneys claim Time Warner “unilaterally removed” Journal channels even though the company “gave permission to continue carriage while the parties worked to negotiate a resolution.” This comes after Time Warner subscribers in Wisconsin filed a class action suit against the cable provider on Aug. 8, seeking a one-day credit for each day of service interruption.
At this time, Time Warner has had no comment on the pending class action suits. But on the Journal letter to the Wisconsin attorney general, Time Warner said: “We look forward to discussing with the Attorney General why the law cited by Journal Broadcasting Group does not apply in this situation, and why Journal persists in misleading its viewers in this way.”
For more on the Time Warner disputes, check out AdWeek.
And for more entertainment law, check out these InsideCounsel stories:
Judge dismisses racial bias claim against Paula Deen
Marvel can keep rights to the Fantastic Four and other comic book characters
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
SEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1How Cohen Seglias Started With a Construction Practice and Turned It Into a Full-Service Law Firm
- 2Blank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
- 3'I Was Deeply Offended': A Judge's Introspection
- 4Insurance Coverage for Emerging Supply Chain Risks in Latin America
- 5Building an Ownership Mindset as a Gen Z Junior Associate
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250