Did you catch that front page article in the New York Times about Wall Street mothers and their stay-at-home husbands? The article made a big fuss about the arrangement—like it’s something wild and radical.
But isn’t that the oldest trick in the book? I thought everyone knew that having someone back on the home front is the secret to success. Isn’t that the primary reason men have always had-it-all (or at least more)?
From what I’ve seen, it’s not an unknown model in Big Law. Yesterday, I wrote about the NYT article for Time’s ideas section, looking at it from the legal profession angle:
You can go to any number of big firms in New York City where there’s a modicum of female partners . . . and the buzz among the associates is that those women in power are either unattached or married to men who stay at home. “They seem to belong to some sort of househusband club,” said one associate about the female partners with kids at Davis Polk & Wardwell.
Click here to vote for the Careerist as Top ABA Blog in category of Careers/Law Schools. (Voting ends December 20, 2013)
E-mail Vivia Chen: firstname.lastname@example.org Follow her on Twitter: https://twitter.com/lawcareerist