Kramer Levin, HSF Leaders Set Out Merger Timeline, Structure
In their first interview since announcing a transatlantic tie-up, the leaders of both firms spoke to Law.com about the combined firm’s timing, structure and priorities.
November 12, 2024 at 01:44 PM
5 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel will vote in mid-February to secure an official merger on May 1, 2025, the leaders have explained; however, Kramer Levin’s 63-lawyer Paris office will not be part of the deal.
In an exclusive interview with Law.com, leaders of both firms explained how they plan to spend the coming months talking to their respective partnerships about the rationale behind the deal, ahead of a vote that requires 75% approval from both sides.
Kramer Levin co-managing partner Howard Spilko said the management was not taking the vote for granted and would be working on discussions “on a very concerted basis." Kramer Levin already had a partner meeting Monday.
Justin D’Agostino, HSF’s CEO, and Rebecca Maslen-Stannage, HSF’s chair and senior partner, will head the new firm and retain their current titles, with Kramer Levin’s co-managing partners— Spilko and Paul Schoeman—sitting on the new firm’s executive committee and other firm governance bodies.
Kramer Levin will also have representation on the combined firm’s global council, which HSF currently operates, chaired by Maslen-Stannage, to ensure that the “Kramer team is at the top table for the new combined firm”, D’Agostino said.
Although the merger will involve little geographic overlap, the one place outside New York where both firms have an office is Paris, where Kramer Levin’s operation will now spin off and not be part of the combined firm. The Paris operation was acquired by Kramer Levin in 1999 from legacy American firm Roger & Wells when it chose to break away from a merger with Clifford Chance.
The firm’s leaders stressed that, beyond Kramer’s Paris office breaking away, there were no plans to make cuts in any of the firm’s regions; D’Agostino said that there was no intention to change away from HSF’s current strategy regarding its “international platform."
HSF Kramer firm will also operate a U.S.-specific executive team that will oversee the day-to-day running of the combined firm’s U.S. business. The U.S. executive team will host practice representatives to ensure the U.S. business is “plugged in” to the firm’s “global ecosystem." It is expected, however, that the U.S. executive will be made up largely of people from Kramer Levin.
The leaders also set out a five-year investment plan that will target growth of the combined firm’s capabilities in private equity in New York, its class actions business, and its antitrust and CIFIUS-related specialisms, alongside a focus on growing its bench strength in U.S. energy.
A challenge facing the new leaders is how to marry Kramer Levin’s significantly higher profit per equity partner figures with HSF’s.
The leaders said they would be working on a remuneration structure that allows the firm to have one integrated profit pool but to remain competitive in the U.S. It is likely to be a combination of lockstep and merit-based pay, but the details are still being worked out, they said. They added they had no plans to de-equitize partners.
Maslen-Stannage said, however, that having a single profit pool was critically important to the firm.
“We will have transitional arrangements that make sure everyone continues to benefit from the value they bring,” she added, but added that they can still operate as a “true partnership” while still recognizing that “there might be more profitable regions” that are “remunerated accordingly."
|
‘Immediate Scale’
Talks between the two firms began in the summer, with HSF’s leaders approaching Kramer Levin, according to Schoeman, Kramer’s co-managing partner. “We were not specifically out looking for a merger,” he said, “but when Justin and Rebecca came to visit with us [in the summer] and laid out the vision for the combined firm, it was so immediately enticing and the logic so compelling that we moved forward on it with great excitement.”
He added the pair became co-heads of the U.S. firm in 2020 and were “alert to what is happening in the legal environment."
Spilko added that the deal was a “unique” opportunity that “gives us immediate scale and strength in a way that we could not achieve organically."
“When this opportunity presented itself to us, we saw it was quite unique, and that it would give us the ability to scale up immediately,” he added.
D’Agostino explained HSF “felt that gap we have by not having scale in the U.S. was something we want to fix."
“HSF is the last top-tier international law firm without scale in the U.S.,” said D’Agostino. “Kramer Levin is a premier U.S. firm with top-quality clients and people in New York, D.C. and Silicon Valley. And when you marry those, you create something very powerful and unique.”
HSF engaged consultants to help it find an appropriate merger partner “because it was such a huge priority for the firm to build in the U.S.” He said Kramer Levin emerged as the firm with ideal synergies and a cultural fit.
When asked about the recent departure of Barry Berke and his litigation group, a top practice for Kramer Levin, Schoeman said Berke's move was not tied to the pending merger. "Barry made decisions for his own reasons," he said. "But they were not merger-related."
Berke and four other top litigators left Kramer Levin to go to Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, about two weeks before the merger announcement. According to a source familiar with the timing, Berke began talking with Gibson Dunn around February 2024, before any serious talks with HSF.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
6 minute readHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Trending Stories
- 1'No Finer Work': New York City Council Confirms Next Corporation Counsel
- 2Here’s What Litigators Want For Christmas
- 3Reported Refusal to Officiate Gay Wedding Prompts Review by NY Judicial Misconduct Watchdog
- 4Frozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
- 5CooperSurgical Class Action Survives Motion to Dismiss
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250