Hughes Hubbard Lays Off Attorneys and Staff After Receiving PPP Loan
The firm received between $5 million-$10 million from the SBA in April to save more than 400 jobs.
July 07, 2020 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
Hughes Hubbard & Reed's office in Manhattan, New York. Photo: Ryland West/ALM
Hughes Hubbard & Reed—an AmLaw 200 firm that received a multimillion-dollar paycheck protection loan from the Small Business Administration—has laid off an undisclosed number of its attorneys and staff, according to firm statements Tuesday.
The New York-based firm confirmed the layoffs to Above the Law, which reported that associates were affected. The firm said in a separate statement to Law.com that the PPP loan money was used for its intended purpose, "to save jobs during the worst of the crisis." But now more than three months later, the firm said, it felt the "deep impact" from court closures and a slowdown in deal activity, and the firm made "difficult decisions on staffing to address the current environment."
Firm chair Ted Mayer declined to comment further Tuesday afternoon, and the firm declined to disclose how many attorneys and staff members were affected by layoffs. According to Above the Law, which pointed to a lack of work triggering layoffs, Hughes Hubbard is offering affected associates three months severance pay as well as five complimentary sessions with a legal recruiter to find a new job.
Hughes Hubbard's attorney head count was 248 in 2019, including 138 associates, according to NLJ 500 data.
Hughes Hubbard is among the dozens of Am Law 200 firms that received PPP loans from the SBA, after Congress in March earmarked $350 billion in funding as business loans as the coronavirus pandemic caused economic turmoil in the U.S. and beyond. The firm on April 15 received between $5 million to $10 million from CitiBank and said in its application the money would preserve 442 jobs, according to the SBA data.
"We decided in the early stage of the pandemic to keep our entire team intact for as long as we could, hopeful for a swift economic recovery," the firm said in a statement Tuesday. "We were one of the more than 100 firms that decided in the early stage of the pandemic to apply for the PPP and were approved based on the SBA criteria. That money was used for its intended purpose, to save jobs during the worst of the crisis."
"Now more than three months into the pandemic, the deep impact of court closures and a slowdown in deal activity have given us a better-informed sense of the manner in which the pandemic has changed the way we do business. We, like other firms, have made some difficult decisions on staffing to address the current environment," the firm's statement continued. "We regret the hardship these steps cause as we, and the industry, evolve to meet this changing environment. We have confidence that the action we take today will enable us to serve our clients, to compete at the highest level and to deploy our people effectively."
The Hughes Hubbard layoffs come months after much of the legal industry responded to the pandemic in the first and second quarter with pay cuts, furloughs, layoffs and other austerity measures. At the time, Hughes Hubbard resisted cost-cutting measures.
The firm's gross revenue and head count have been trending downward since 2013, when it brought in a record $396 million and employed 351 lawyers, ranking No. 72 on the 2014 Am Law 200. It fell off the Am Law 100 rankings in 2017. Last year, the firm's gross revenue dropped by 5.7% to $288.1 million.
Read More:
Dozens of Big Law Firms Received Millions in PPP Loan Funds
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Veteran Litigators Move From Sidley Austin to Alston & Bird's New Chicago Office Veteran Litigators Move From Sidley Austin to Alston & Bird's New Chicago Office](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/70/58/d14e3a464ad6ae5730c027d198dd/mccall-chiarello-767x633.jpg)
Veteran Litigators Move From Sidley Austin to Alston & Bird's New Chicago Office
3 minute read!['Lack of Independence' or 'Tethered to the Law'? Witnesses Speak on Bondi 'Lack of Independence' or 'Tethered to the Law'? Witnesses Speak on Bondi](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9e/23/34bc2e914f91b1ee711d662f4a77/pamela-bondi-767x633.jpg)
'Lack of Independence' or 'Tethered to the Law'? Witnesses Speak on Bondi
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250