After a Record Year, Venable Cuts Pay, Furloughs Some Staff to 'Prudently Prepare'
"We have taken steps to tailor staffing needs to the current environment," the firm said in a statement.
April 13, 2020 at 07:36 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Even after a strong 2019 in which Venable's revenue soared, the firm said it has taken steps to respond to the economic uncertainty created by the coronavirus pandemic, including postponing partner distributions, reducing salaries and furloughing certain staff.
Venable's gross revenue shot up 15.2% to $657 million in 2019, its first full year after combining with 100-lawyer intellectual property boutique Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto. Its profits per equity partner inched up to $1.17 million, with a 30% profit margin.
But like other Am Law 200 firms that have responded to the pandemic, the Washington, D.C.-based firm said it had to adjust. "Our actions include postponing certain distributions to equity partners, implementing tiered compensation reductions for attorneys and staff, and temporarily furloughing certain staff in roles that primarily support office operations," the firm said in an April 10 statement to ALM.
"Because the extent and duration of the disruption and its impact remain uncertain, we have taken steps to tailor staffing needs to the current environment and prudently prepare the firm for the future," the statement added.
A firm spokeswoman could not immediately comment on the percentage reductions in compensation across attorney and staff tiers and how many staff members were furloughed.
As for its upcoming summer associates, Venable said it informed participants that it will not start the program May 18, nor will the firm have a 10-week program, as originally planned. The firm said it will contact participants when it has more information and it has made more concrete decisions about the summer program.
Venable added that it entered the period of economic and societal disruption "with a solid start to the year that continued through the first quarter" and that "the diversity of our practices, the quality of our attorneys and professionals, and our relationships with our clients are very strong."
Indeed, Venable's revenue growth last year made 2019 one of its strongest years ever. Even with a nearly 12% boost in head count to 735 lawyers after the merger, the firm's revenue-per-lawyer rose 3% to $894,000.
In March 19 interview, firm chairman Stu Ingis said it was too early to talk about cost-cutting measures and billings were strong at the beginning of the year, but he said the firm was modeling different scenarios and revenues.
"We're certainly expecting a very different world for at least a couple of months," he said at the time. "The world is just completely unknown right now."
Ingis said some of the firm's practices had kept busy with the response to the crisis, including its Food and Drug Administration practice, and the firm was representing major companies in response to legislation. He also saw a pick up in employment and restructuring work.
But Ingis said last month he has started to see a slow down in litigation, with courts closing, and some deals have paused.
Meanwhile, integrating with legacy Fitzpatrick lawyers will continue through video conferencing.
"We're integrated enough with them that culturally, they're already one of us. So if this had been a year ago, it might have been more challenging," Ingis said. To become fully remote, Ingis said, the firm conducted training and purchased more technology licenses.
Overall, he said the Fitzpatrick combination had been an "unequivocal success." Though the merger, Venable added a number of large client relationships that pay multiple millions of dollars in legal fees: 13 of the firm's top 100 clients are former Fitzpatrick clients, the firm noted.
Among major matters last year, the firm helped secure a nearly $90 million jury verdict for client Vectura Ltd. in a patent infringement case against GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Glaxo Group Ltd. The firm also represented the daughters of Tom Petty, through company Petty Unlimited LLC, in a dispute over his estate.
While 104 attorneys from Fitzpatrick planned to join the firm, the firm's head count only had a net gain of 78 attorneys last year. Ingis said there was a "small amount of attrition" after the merger due to conflicts, retirements and some people leaving for other firms. The firm's equity tier had a net gain of 10 lawyers last year to 170 partners.
Venable also added an entertainment and media group of nine lawyers from Kelley Drye & Warren, a group that kept busy, Ingis said.
Ingis said Venable was unique in having a high percentage of dollars funneled to charitable efforts. The firm, which provided nearly $4 million in grants to community organizations in 2019, last year hired Michael Bigley as director of the Venable Foundation, Inc., the firm's philanthropic arm funded by partners, he said.
Ingis said the firm was in discussions with pro bono clients about the best way to help this year. "2020 is going to be as much about helping and servicing clients as much as we can, as it is about helping the community," he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Funnel Millions to Congressional Races, Though Skew Toward Dems
4 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readDLA Piper Exhibited 'Far From Exemplary Conduct' in Patent Infringement Case, Judge Finds
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250