'Nobody Is Recruiting Over the Summer': OCI Season Postponed
Moving on-campus interviews from late summer into late fall or early winter will give students some breathing room and give law firms some time to better assess their hiring needs, career services deans say.
April 02, 2020 at 12:47 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
|
Law firms won't be recruiting summer associates in late July and early August this year.
All but one of the so-called T-14 law schools by Thursday had announced postponements to their on-campus interview programs due to the coronavirus pandemic, and a growing number in the top 50 of the U.S. News & World Report rankings have followed suit.
Columbia Law School, which sends a higher number of graduates into associate jobs at large firms than any other school, became the first to postpone OCI on March 23. But the movement picked up steam this week when Harvard Law School, New York University School of Law and the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School joined the list of campuses delaying summer associate recruiting. Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law is the one T-14 school that hasn't yet announced a delay.
"Nobody is recruiting over the summer," said Harvard career services Dean Mark Weber. "It's off the table. I think January will become the new August."
The delays are the result of numerous factors, but law firms initiated the push to hold off on recruiting programs that bring partners to campus for hundreds of screening interviews with incoming 2Ls.
First, it's not clear that those in-person interviews will even be possible in the late summer if social distancing rules remain in effect.
Second, firms are already dealing with significant economic fallout of the pandemic and uncertainty of their futures and staff needs. The past two weeks have brought news of law firms laying off staff and associates, withholding partner pay and furloughing associates. That means hiring summer associates who will go on to become the firm's new associate class in 2022 would come at a time when firms know little about what their staffing needs will be two years ahead of time. If firms moved ahead with hiring over the summer, they'd likely hire half as many summer associates, Weber noted.
Third, many law firms have delayed the start of their upcoming summer associate programs, pushing them later into the summer. They do not have the desire or the capabilities to simultaneously run those programs—many of which will now be completed remotely—while also juggling summer associate recruiting.
And finally, most Big Law feeder schools have adopted pass/fail grading for the spring semester. Law firms want to see at least two semesters of grades when making summer associate hiring decisions. Delaying the hiring process should give them more than one semester of grades to evaluate.
"I firmly believe that the January schedule is the best solution to this current problem," said Gavin White, the global hiring partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. "I'd go further and say that I hope we can continue with the January schedule in future years."
White said he has not heard any law school say that it intends to hold summer associates interview programs in July or August, though not all have committed to a January timetable.
Yale Law School, Stanford Law School, the University of Chicago Law School, the University of Michigan Law School and Duke Law School are among the schools that have told students that OCI is postponed until late fall or early 2021, but have not committed to a more specific timetable. Other schools, including Columbia, Harvard, NYU, the University of Virginia School of Law and the University of California, Berkeley School of Law have said OCI will now be in January.
Still others, including Georgetown University Law Center and the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law, have said January or February are both under consideration.
"I know that our law school and legal employer members are actively working through the impact of the current situation on summer programs and recruiting plans," said James Leipold, executive director of the National Association for Law Placement. "During the current state of civil emergency, the NALP board of directors does not believe that there can be uniform solutions that will serve all institutions, but they do believe firmly that there are a multiplicity of solutions that will preserve the fundamental values of fairness, access, and transparency to which NALP is committed."
Weber said that most students at Harvard welcomed Tuesday's news that the summer associate recruiting program will be delayed until January.
"Most students really appreciated the move," he said. "It's one less thing for them to worry about."
In its email to students last week announcing the delay of summer associate interview, Chicago's career services office noted some advantages to the new winter recruiting schedule.
"This has many benefits for you, including giving you more time to research employers, to explore practice areas through research and classes, and to work with us on your job search strategies," the email reads.
Postponing OCI essentially gives both students and law firms some time and breathing room to make plans amid the rapidly changing situation, and the delay gives the pandemic time to subside before hiring takes place, Weber noted. Even under that rosy scenario, career services offices are bracing for hiring slowdowns.
"We know next year won't have the same kind of robust hiring that we've seen for the past two years," Weber said. "That's not hard to figure out."
But Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky wrote in an email to students Monday that delaying OCI until January gives them the best possible chance at securing a summer associate position under the difficult circumstances brought on by the coronavirus outbreak.
"Employers will have a much better sense of their hiring needs in January than in August and there is reason to hope that they will be able to do more hiring at the later time," he wrote. "Most of all, it is clear that employers would prefer this shift."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllK&L Gates Partners With AltaClaro to Offer Gen AI Supervisory Course for Firm Partners and Managers
6 minute readNorton Rose Fulbright's New Houston Office Features Views of Urban Park
3 minute readBig Law Advises University Clients Amid 'Huge Influx of Demand' Over Protests
5 minute read'Uncommon Approach': Husch Blackwell To Train Lawyers for In-House Roles
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250