Have Law Firms Lost Their Urge to Merge?
With one big trans-Atlantic deal now off the table, 2019 could be a year without a blockbuster law firm combination.
September 05, 2019 at 02:30 PM
3 minute read
Now that the proposed trans-Atlantic merger between O'Melveny & Myers and Allen & Overy has officially fizzled, a deal between two Midwestern regional firms could turn out to be the biggest law firm combination announced in 2019.
So far, Friday's news that Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister will merge with Briggs and Morgan—a Minneapolis-based firm with about 135 lawyers—marks the largest law firm acquisition of the year. That's a far cry from 2018, when five much larger deals had already been announced by early summer, according to data collected by ALM and Altman Weil.
By this time last year—which was, in fairness, a record year for mergers—15 law firms had confirmed plans to acquire other firms with 20 or more lawyers. Those included 900-lawyer Bryan Cave joining with the 666 attorneys from Berwin Leighton Paisner, 700-lawyer Hunton & Williams combining with 300-lawyer Andrews Kurth, and Foley & Lardner growing to more than 1,000 lawyers through its merger with 230-attorney Gardere Wynne Sewell.
This year, just seven deals involving acquired firms with 20 or more lawyers have been announced or reported—almost as many as Dentons alone announced last year.
"It's cyclical," said Brad Hildebrandt, founder of Hildebrandt Consulting and a mainstay in the world of law firm merger advising since 1978. "There were so many mergers the last couple of years that we are seeing a slowdown. It isn't related to anything else."
In calling it quits on their own merger talks after 18 months, Magic Circle firm Allen & Overy and LA-based O'Melveny & Myers cited global economic factors as barriers to a deal. Hildebrandt said that while acute situations like a no-deal Brexit, Hong Kong protests and the continuing pain of U.S./China trade battles have ripple effects everywhere, those are felt more by global firms, while most mergers with U.S. firms have been domestic.
Acknowledging he's aware of other merger talks in the works, Hildebrandt said that he doesn't expect any deals that would eclipse the Taft/Briggs merger as the year's largest.
Those mergers that do occur will most likely be between midsize (which he defined as between 250-500 attorneys) and smaller firms, Hildebrandt said.
"The pressure is on the midsize and small firms," he said. "The growth of the larger firms is forcing consolidation in the midmarket space."
Overall, the remainder of 2019 is likely to be relatively quiet for law firm merger activity, he said, with most firms keeping focused on year-end profitability. Mergers in 2020 will be dependent upon broader U.S. and global economics and the appetite of firms that are already doing well to accelerate growth, he added, cautioning that no one can predict the future.
"People who use crystal balls," Hildebrandt said, "eat a lot of glass."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss Promotes Into Both Partner Tiers Amid 'Existential War for Talent'
5 minute readSteptoe Offers Associates New Flexible Billable Hour Tracks in Revamped Comp System
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Austin Appeals Court Rejects Free Speech Defense in Attorney's $2.9M Disgorgement Suit
- 2Home Improvement App Thumbtack Hires Ex-SmileDirectClub Legal Chief
- 3After Fining Investment Firms Billions for Lost Text Messages, Regulators Turn Scrutiny to Audio Recordings
- 4Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
- 5Jones Day Adds 10 US Supreme Court Clerks to Associate Ranks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250