What Happened After This Big Law Attorney Told the World About His Depression
Reed Smith attorney Mark Goldstein describes the response he received after he detailed his own mental health struggles, and what it says about the progress the profession is making around mental health.
July 07, 2019 at 05:01 PM
7 minute read
I was certain that “disheartened” is a word. No question there. But what about its converse: “heartened”? Perhaps I should be embarrassed to admit this, but I wasn't 100 percent sure. Eventually, I decided to look it up. (Spoiler alert: it's a real word.) Why was the word “heartened” so important to me though? That's simple: because I have been using it so frequently, in the past few months, when discussing the future of mental health issues in the legal profession.
Let's rewind for a moment to February 12, 2019. Around 2:30 pm that day, The American Lawyer published an article chronicling my journey with mental health disabilities (more particularly, severe depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and anxiety.) I ruminated on the panoply of possible responses. Would I be labeled “that crazy Reed Smith lawyer” or perhaps “the attorney who spewed almost 2,000 words on his 'mental breakdown'”? How would clients and colleagues perceive me? Would anyone even read the article?
Almost five months later, however, it would not be an exaggeration to say that “going public” with my story has changed my life—for the better—and hopefully the lives, or mindsets, of others as well (even if only incrementally).
In response to the article, I received emails, handwritten notes and phone calls from thousands—literally—of individuals from all walks of life, both within and outside of the legal profession. I heard from judges and elected officials. I heard from big firm lawyers and solo practitioners. I heard from in-house lawyers. I spent time talking with attorneys, in both the private and public practice spheres, about the mental health issues bearing down on them or their loved ones. I was invited to speak at various conferences, panels, events and webinars, and at several law schools.
Dozens of clients, including in-house counsel and human resource professionals, reached out to express their support. Many shared their own personal mental health trials and tribulations. Several even asked me to speak with their workforces about my struggles. Internally at Reed Smith, the reaction was equally supportive. I was inundated with messages of compassion from hundreds of attorneys and staff members (just as mental health conditions do not discriminate against their victims based on age, race, gender or the like, they similarly do not discriminate based on whether one holds a juris doctor degree).
I was astonished at how many people have faced, are currently facing, or know someone facing the same issues I did. These are people I respect. People that our industry would term “rainmakers.” People I have seen on TV or read about in periodicals. Back in February, I was unsure whether a single person would be able to relate to or identify with my article. But to see it resonate with so many individuals from such diverse backgrounds, and, more importantly, to hear them share their own journeys, was beyond anything I could have fathomed.
Despite this, I am reminded every single day that mental health issues still pervade the legal industry—and to a staggering degree. (Google the statistics—they are alarming.) I am reminded that this is a subject that remains undiscussed, and one that cannot even be broached, in many corners of the profession. I am reminded that my journey is not necessarily reflective of others' experiences with mental health issues and that I can only speak to my own ordeal. I am reminded that change will not be achieved overnight. And I am reminded that we are in only the nascent stages of a journey—one that may well be frustrating at times and that will last years, if not decades.
But I am still extremely heartened for the future state of discourse and, more importantly, action concerning mental health issues in the legal profession. Why?
Because, in the past few months, I have been lucky enough to cross paths with what I consider to be some of the most courageous individuals not just in our profession, but in any field. Because I have met people who have unapologetically made it their mission to openly address and hopefully, someday, eradicate the mental health stigma. Because I have met so many people who, at least to me, epitomize what it means to be a leader.
I am heartened because I have met hundreds of folks who, although they may not themselves suffer or have suffered from mental health conditions, want to learn more and to spread awareness. Maybe it's because a family member is in distress. Maybe it's because they suspect a colleague needs help. Or maybe it's simply because they know that mental health disorders are, by far, the most pressing health issue facing Americans and, in particular, attorneys today.
I am heartened because thousands of lawyers from coast to coast have embraced with open arms my story and the stories of other attorneys who have, in recent months and years, also publicized their own struggles with mental health issues. Because the tidal wave of support has yet to recede, almost five months later. In fact, when I decided, recently, to create a separate email folder with just a small sampling of some of the more poignant article responses I received, I could only whittle it down to 379 messages.
I am heartened because we are starting to see some real, meaningful change on this issue, even if it is incremental. A number of jurisdictions, for instance, recently began the process to remove mental health-related questions from bar applications. And the number of firms who have signed the American Bar Association's pledge to tackle lawyer mental health and substance-use issues, continues to grow each week. Likewise, in just the past few months alone, a slew of U.S. law schools have committed themselves to providing students—from 1L to 3L—with mental health education and support services (it is astounding how many attorneys have conveyed to me that their mental health struggles began during law school or bar exam review/preparation).
In short, I am heartened for the future because we, as a profession, finally appear ready to start having a real, constructive dialogue on the complicated, and often uncomfortable, issue that is mental health. The dialogue is going to have its ebbs and flows, but it is a dialogue nonetheless—one that we were not having, and in fact actively avoided, until quite recently.
I want to end this article with something I've mentioned at several recent events. The reason I wrote my original article and also the reason I've written this one, is to put a voice and a face to mental health issues and the mental health stigma in the legal profession. With this in mind, I'm Mark. I'm a Reed Smith employment lawyer. I suffer from mental health disabilities. And if you do too, or if you simply are passionate about or can relate to this issue, remember that you are not alone and that together, we can create the future about which I am so heartened.
Read more: Minds Over Matters: An Examination of Mental Health in the Legal Profession
Mark Goldstein is in the employment practice of Reed Smith in New York. He is also a member of Law.com's Mental Health Advisory Board.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250