Tiger Cub Follows Kavanaugh
Bingo! Sophia Chua-Rubenfeld is off to the high court!
June 14, 2019 at 02:53 PM
5 minute read
Like duh. So, of course, the No. 1 daughter of Tiger Mom (that's Yale Law prof Amy Chua, if you need reminding) is heading to the U.S. Supreme Court to clerk for Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
That was a no-brainer. First of all, you'll remember that even before “I-Like-Beer” Kavanaugh became a household name, Chua's daughter Sophia Chua-Rubenfeld was already slated to clerk for him on the Court of Appeals. Plus, her mom adored the guy, extolling his record of hiring female clerks (she helped place 10 or so female Yale Law graduates as his clerks) in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal after his nomination to the Supreme Court (though before the sexual allegations against him by Christine Blasey Ford came out).
Bingo! Now, Sophia is off to the high court!
The upshot: Tiger Mom, along with Tiger Cub, is getting slammed by the media. The gist of the criticism is that Chua wrote the op-ed to curry favor with Kavanaugh in order to get her daughter that coveted high court clerkship.
Financial Times writer Edward Luce calls Chua “a shrewd string-puller,” saying that “overnight the Chuas have turned into emblems of what Americans distrust about their meritocracy.” Slate's Jeremy Stahl essentially makes similar criticisms, suggesting that the Chuas “might apologize to [Above the Law's Elie] Mystal [who wrote a year ago that Chua's op-ed was self-serving], or turn down the clerkship if they “had anything resembling shame.”
So are the criticisms fair to Chua and her daughter? Well, yes. And no.
First, the timing of her hiring is awful—really awful. It happened barely a year after that fawning op-ed by Chua and Sophia's own declaration on Twitter that she had no plans to clerk for the Supreme Court because of her military obligations (she served in the ROTC in college). While it's plausible that Sophia didn't expect the Army to allow her another deferment (she's now clerking for Britt Grant, judge on the 11th Circuit), why the rush to clerk for Kavanaugh now? I mean, Kavanaugh will be there for a long, long, time, and she could clerk for him after her Army stint.
It's almost as if Kavanaugh is rubbing our noses in it, says CNN commentator Kate Maltby: “Appointing the daughter of the powerful woman who may have helped your nomination—it's the latest way to 'own the libs.' Kavanaugh wants us to know he simply doesn't care what we think of him. He's won.”
But where some critics lost me is when they overplay the nepotism and privilege argument. Yeah, Sophia has a leg up as the daughter of two Yale Law School professors, but comparing her situation to the low-performing students caught in the recent college admissions cheating scandal? Seriously?
Vogue quips: “For fans of Operation Varsity Blues comes another twisted tale of privilege.” And FT's Luce rails that what Chua did was considered legal, while “actresses Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman, on the other hand, are accused of having broken the law.”
Some of the criticisms devolved into a tirade about class and economic status. New York Magazine rants about the tuition at the private school where Chua's daughters attended, adding, “Their children were bound for the Ivy League no matter how well they played the piano, or how long they stood in the cold. The Kavanaugh clerkship is gilt leaf on an already privileged life.”
Ok. Maybe. But so what?
By all accounts, Sophia was a stellar student, who served as the articles editor of the Yale Law Journal and graduated at the top of her class.
Above the Law founder and Yale Law grad David Lat, who broke the story of Sophia's clerkship on his Twitter feed on the Supreme Court, says: “Sophia was incredibly qualified: Harvard undergrad, ROTC, and Yale Law, where she had perfect grades.” He adds: “The legal-genius apple doesn't fall far from the tree. We shouldn't be surprised when smart, high-powered lawyers breed and produce more smart, high-powered lawyers.”
That's a bit gushy, but I get Lat's drift: Sophia is no Kim Kardashian. No doubt she's got the chops to land a Supreme Court clerkship.
Which gets to my larger point: It's unfortunate that there's a cloud over her clerkship. It raises the appearance of impropriety. We'll never know if Chua wrote that op-ed mainly for her daughter's benefit, nor will we know if it mattered. Let's remember that Chua was hardly the only woman who came out defending him. His former female clerks wrote an impassioned letter to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee endorsing his nomination. Fair or not, there's a lingering smell of something foul.
Sadly, it all seems to reinforce the transactional ethos of our time. I won't bore you with all the current and former Trump administration officials who seem to have little compunction about leveraging their position for personal gain, except to say that there seems to be a quid pro quo for everything.
I have no reason to doubt that Sophia is super-qualified to be a Supreme Court clerk. I just wish she were clerking for another justice.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden's Big China Cuts and What They Mean for the Market
It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
4 minute readAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250