Greenberg Traurig Can't Dodge $1.3M Suit Over 'Gotti' Film Financing
Critics panned the movie and a judge panned the lawsuit. But unlike bad reviews, a court decision can be overturned on appeal.
June 11, 2019 at 04:34 PM
4 minute read
Greenberg Traurig must face a $1.3 million lawsuit by a construction executive turned producer of the poorly received 2018 biopic about mobster John Gotti, a New York state appeals court ruled Tuesday.
A panel of New York's Appellate Division, First Department concluded that a trial court judge had erred in dismissing Thomas P. Devlin's suit against the international law firm, finding that Greenberg was responsible for looking out for Devlin's interests, not just those of Fiore Films, the company producing the film.
According to a 2017 complaint, Devlin was a major investor in Fiore, which secured the film rights for the oft-delayed and ultimately panned John Travolta vehicle “Gotti” in 2010.
Devlin alleged in the complaint that not only did Greenberg represent Fiore, but partner Steven Beer also represented a Dubai-based investment company that was also interested in financing the film.
That client, Treasures FZE, was allegedly willing to put up $200 million in financing for “Gotti” and other film projects, on the condition that Fiore put $1.3 million into an escrow account to account for closing costs for the financing. According to the complaint, Devlin and his attorney, Michael Froch, repeatedly questioned Beer and Greenberg about the propriety of the arrangement before they agreed to complete the transaction.
Then, according to the complaint, while Devlin was on a flight to Zurich to close the financing agreement, Treasures emptied out the escrow account without permission. A criminal complaint filed in New York federal court in 2015 indicates that the figure behind Treasures FZE was actually Scarsdale, New York, resident Sal Carpanzano. Carpanzano eventually pleaded guilty to an eight-count information in 2015 involving the fraud on Fiore and several other frauds.
The terms of his sentence, which was scheduled for September 2018, are under seal, but they include over $10 million in restitution.
While “Gotti” was finally made, Devlin said that Greenberg's failure to protect Fiore from being duped ultimately cost him and the company $10 million.
A trial court judge dismissed the suit in July 2018, finding that because Devlin acknowledged that Fiore retained Greenberg, the firm did not have a fiduciary relationship to Devlin himself.
However, the appeals court found that the complaint suggested a deeper relationship between the parties.
“Plaintiff alleges that he—as well as Fiore Films LLC—was defendant's client. He does not base his claim of an attorney-client relationship solely on the fact that he paid the bills that defendant sent to Fiore Films and was a part owner of that entity,” the panel said. The amended complaint alleges that defendant “knew that [plaintiff] was dependent and was relying on [it] … to provide honest and diligent advice with respect to escrow funds.”
The appeals court did side with Greenberg in concluding that Devlin was not entitled to $10 million in alleged damages. The panel said that while the complaint asserted that the firm's actions tarnished the credibility of Fiore Films, there was no cause of action in the complaint over injuries to Fiore.
Neither New York attorney Gerard McCabe, who represents Devlin, nor Steptoe & Johnson LLP's Justin Yu, who represents Greenberg, immediately responded to requests for comment Tuesday.
“We are of course disappointed that this claim, which we believe is meritless, has been revived, although correctly limited in amount. We will continue to defend against it,” a Greenberg representative later added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
5 minute readWhat Does the Opening of Brazil's Gambling Market Mean For Global Firms?
Trending Stories
- 1'Entitlement to Information Has Its Limits:' Judge Denies Another Discovery Deadline Extension in Trademark Suit
- 2Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
- 3Fifty Years After Nixon, Progress on Amending Rule 17(c)
- 4Inhouse Launches Generative AI-Powered Legal Agent and Attorney Referral Platform
- 5Mind Your Business (Affairs)!
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250