Uber Foe Shannon Liss-Riordan Dials Back Employment Practice for US Senate Run
Can the class-action dynamo break Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey's four-decade streak in Congress?
May 21, 2019 at 03:24 PM
4 minute read
As a plaintiffs lawyer, Shannon Liss-Riordan has taken on Starbucks, Harvard University, American Airlines and most prominently, Uber. She is derided by corporations and lauded by workers for her employment practice. And she is hoping that her reputation as a fighter can translate into a Democratic primary upset in Massachusetts, where she's running to unseat Ed Markey in 2020.
Liss-Riordan, a partner in the Boston firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, announced her entry into the senate race Monday, complete with local media interviews, campaign site and email blast to supporters.
She told ALM she will be stepping away from day-to-day activity at her 10-attorney firm to focus on the campaign. The firm itself will stay busy, she said, with ongoing matters against a roster of gig-economy companies that includes Uber, Lyft, Grubhub, Postmakes and Doordash, as well as newer cases such as an age discrimination suit against IBM.
Liss-Riordan said she believes many of the issues that the country is tackling right now, from growing income inequality to health care access to opioid addiction, can be traced back to workers not receiving fair pay.
“If this continues, employment as we know it will cease to exist,” she said.
“I'm in this race in order to offer voters in Massachusetts a choice,” Liss-Riordan told WBUR's Kimberly Atkins on Monday. “I have been a tireless worker and a tireless advocate for the rights of working people, and I see the issues that are happening in the workplace are only fueling income inequality—which is growing to maddening levels.”
Most of her legal career has been spent representing lower-paid workers such as service staff, baristas, delivery drivers and even strippers against large corporations and business entities. She more recently has been the go-to lawyer for gig-workers looking to challenge their companies regarding their employment classification.
Her litigation campaign against Uber resulted in a rise in national name recognition, as well as a $20 million settlement for drivers in California and Massachusetts. She declined to comment on separate settlements Uber announced one day before its May 9 IPO, in which the company said it expects to pay $146 to $170 million to resolve claims by thousands of additional drivers who signed arbitration agreements with the company.
Liss-Riodan said in an email to her supporters that her practice over the past 20 years has showed her how flawed the status quo is and how the wealthy have gamed the system. “They have been writing the rules for too long—we need to make a change,” she said in the email.
She is running on the outsider platform, as she has never run for or held public office. But she has previously been active in politics. She said watching the Anita Hill hearings in 1992 were an inspiration for her to get involved in political and social engagement. She helped found an organization called The Third Wave whose goal was to motivate young women and minorities to get involved in the political process. Twenty-seven years later, after being taken aback by the outcome of the Kavanaugh hearings last year, she has come full circle in her political activities, now as a candidate.
Markey has spent close to 43 years representing Massachusetts in the House and Senate, and whether he is ripe for a primary upset is up for debate. In reliably left-leaning Massachusetts, the primary could very well be the election, so odds are that the Markey campaign will take the challenge seriously.
Longtime congressman Michael Capuano was defeated by the outsider campaign of Ayanna Pressley last year in Massachusetts, and according to the Boston Globe some political operatives believe that sort of upset could happen again. But it won't be easy. Markey has been actively fundraising and has about $3.5 million in his campaign war chest, according to federal filings.
Read More
Uber Reveals Settlement of Thousands of Driver Misclassification Claims the Day Before IPO
Class Certification Granted to Janitors Who Paid Their Employer
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250