Foley & Lardner Suffers 'Cyber Event,' Says Data Safe, As Law Firms Remain Targets
Law firms are as big a target for hackers as ever. Plus, look out for "cryptojackers."
October 29, 2018 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
Foley & Lardner this month experienced what it called a “cyber event” that disrupted its information technology systems despite no client data being accessed, a spokeswoman for the Am Law 100 firm said in an email.
The incident, first reported last week by Bloomberg, is a reminder to law firms that they remain high-priority targets of hackers, ransomware and, more recently, nefarious miners of cryptocurrency.
“We have security safeguards in place designed to protect our systems and data and have confirmed no unauthorized access to client data,” said Foley & Lardner spokeswoman Jill Chanen in a statement. “Safeguarding the security and confidentiality of our client information is and will continue to be our highest priority. Throughout this situation, our professionals continued to provide the level of service excellence our clients expect.”
Foley & Lardner, which earlier this year absorbed Texas-based Gardere Wynne Sewell, did not comment on the nature of the event or provide more details about how it was resolved.
Austin Berglas, global head of professional services at cybersecurity firm BlueVoyant, said the statement from Foley & Lardner seemed to describe what would happen in the event of a ransomware attack or a so-called cryptojacking attack. Neither are necessarily designed to steal client data.
Cryptojacking is a relatively new phenomenon. Cryptojackers use a kind of malware that uses a company's computing network power to run the heavy-duty computing programs that produce or “mine” new virtual currencies such as bitcoin. A survey by network security firm McAfee LLC found that cryptojacking attacks were up 629 percent in the first quarter of this year. McAfee said it recorded nearly 3 million instances of “coin mining” malware during the first quarter of 2018, compared with less than 500,000 just a quarter earlier.
“We've seen cases where we find ransomware in Fort Knox, essentially. There is gold bullion there and the bad guys didn't realize it because that's not what they're looking for,” Berglas said. “It depends what the adversary is looking for. If they are only interested in getting their crypto-mining executables on as many servers as possible, then a company has essentially dodged a bullet. They're dealing with a bad guy who does not want that information, they're just looking for processing power.”
Berglas, a former FBI special agent in charge of cyber who has worked with law firms, said that the vulnerabilities hackers exploit to install ransomware or crypto-mining software can also be used to steal client data. And sometimes, hackers sell access to the vulnerabilities they have found in corporate networks.
“The key here is no matter what if you are seeing unauthorized access, no matter what they did when they got in, you have a problem you need to fix,” Berglas said. “Because that vulnerability can be used by multiple actors in a lot of ways.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Creates Nonequity Partner Tier, Calling for 'Innovation and Adaptation'
5 minute readAssistant Solicitor General Heads to Paul Hastings to Co-Chair Appellate Practice
3 minute read200 Hrs. of Partner Prep Guides Quinn Emanuel's Incredibly Detailed Mock Bankruptcy Trial
Big Law Making Top IP Partner Hires as 'Demand Far Outweighs Supply' of First-Chair Patent Litigators
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250